We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BPS / BW Legal Claim Form - Invalid Permit
Comments
-
Warrant of control, and if youve ever been told of bank accunt numbers to pay them - check back in your letters - add that to the warrant. They can extract the money directly, I believe, or freeze accounts until payment is made.1
-
Reminds me of the famous phrase by Inspector Harry, Callaghan, "do you feel lucky, punk?".You never know how far you can go until you go too far.2
-
What a bunch of chancers, not to pay £110.10 when they lost in court fair and square. Their hot air threats will stick in their throat when it is enforced and costs maybe twice as much.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
C-M - I would maybe include include that letter to the courts, when applying for the warrant, and see if they take a dim view of those threats...2
-
Good idea!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
I also fail to see how they can pass the first of the three tests, namely:
first, it must be shown that the evidence could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use at the trial:
Given they had the WS *well* in advance of the claim, and presumably this was the evidence in chief of the witness, what are they saying was falsified that theyre only now finding out about, and why didnt they find out about it before?
Youc oudl always SAR them - by definition this is information that is personal to you, as it MUST contain your personal info!2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards