WON - Small Claims court case

Le_Kirk

You will receive ONE issue of the claimant's WS - be it original or copy who can tell?

waamo

I don't see how who may, or may not, have been ticketed is of any use to you.

MrMercury

Le_Kirk wrote: »

You will receive ONE issue of the claimant's WS - be it original or copy who can tell?

Thanks.. I received two.. signed for one but didnt have to sign for the other.

MrMercury

The landowner has offered to write a letter stating I was a patron and that he has asked the parking company to cancel the PCN. However, he hanst yet provided this and is now saying that the parking company are also taking him to court because he switched the APNR camera off because his customer are being harassed. Can I use this even though he wont say this in a letter?

MrMercury

Ignore my last post.. I now have the letter saying I was a customer, had permission to park, he instructed the parking company to cancel and he had to remove them from managing the car park as they were hassling his genuine customers

Umkomaas

MrMercury wrote: »

Ignore my last post.. I now have the letter saying I was a customer, had permission to park, he instructed the parking company to cancel and he had to remove them from managing the car park as they were hassling his genuine customers

Gold dust!

MrMercury

Court hearing was today via telephone call.  Decision was to strike out the claim.  CEL didnt turn up but the judge in Portsmouth courts decided to go ahead in their absence.  He noted that I proved I was a patron of the restaurant; he said hes not interested in any signage argument; he noted I am also claiming an abuse of process and that I reference a recent case nearby in Southampton and agrees and therefore is striking out the claim on that basis.  Took less than 10 minutes.
Thank you to everyone for your help.  

D_P_Dance

Excellent now sue the scammer

https://nortonsafe.search.ask.com/web?q=frustration%20of%20contract&ssdcat=321&installsource=nag&source=nag&year=2015&locale=en_gb&geo=gb&version=22.19.9.63&cipherid=0&templatecat=sbu_w_29500_5412_21369175_ns_oem&schemacat=sbu_w&schemaver=1.0.0.0&olpchannel=limited_oem&osvers=10.0&oslocale=iso:gbr&oslang=iso:eng&os=windows&showuninstallsurvey=1&installstatus=updated&vendor=none&vendorsrc=chrome&machinelocation=242&cdest=nag&cmpgn=nov19&o=APN12175&prt=ngc&ver=3.11.3.7&tpr=111&chn=29500&guid=743cfd45-ec5c-4c5b-a851-fc3642bace5c&doi=2020-02-08&ctype=

beamerguy

MrMercury said:

Court hearing was today via telephone call.  Decision was to strike out the claim.  CEL didnt turn up but the judge in Portsmouth courts decided to go ahead in their absence.  He noted that I proved I was a patron of the restaurant; he said hes not interested in any signage argument; he noted I am also claiming an abuse of process and that I reference a recent case nearby in Southampton and agrees and therefore is striking out the claim on that basis.  Took less than 10 minutes.
Thank you to everyone for your help.  

Brilliant ..... A NICE LINE along the south coast  where parking scammers are not welcome
I.O.W, Southampton, Portsmouth, Lewis and Worthing

But you know, these stupid scammers and very dodgy legals will still try their luck, losing money and making themselves look idiots

Castle

MrMercury said:

Court hearing was today via telephone call.  Decision was to strike out the claim.  CEL didnt turn up but the judge in Portsmouth courts decided to go ahead in their absence.  He noted that I proved I was a patron of the restaurant; he said hes not interested in any signage argument; he noted I am also claiming an abuse of process and that I reference a recent case nearby in Southampton and agrees and therefore is striking out the claim on that basis.  Took less than 10 minutes.
Thank you to everyone for your help.  

They couldn't even "turn up" for a phone call!