We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Drainage search - manhole appears to be below the property

thphilpott
Posts: 5 Forumite
Hello
I am in the process of purchasing a new house.
The house has planning permission approved for a small rear extension. The solicitors advised that I would also need permission from the water/sewerage company as the extension would run over an existing sewerage drain.
When I phoned Thames Water about this, they advised that this should not be a problem as long as there is 0.5metres of space between the sewer and the foundations, and that I'd need 3 weeks or so to get official permission should I proceed with the extension, which is fine. However, they flagged a larger potential problem which is that the plan indicates that a manhole somehow appears to be within what used to be the garage (and is now habitable space). The informed me that should I proceed with the extension, I would have to have the manhole moved at my own cost and probably have the sewer rerouted.
As I don't have many posts, unfortunately the forum isn't allowing me to attach a photo of the plan or link to a hosted image online but I'll reply to some other posts (helpfully!) and hopefully it will allow me to do so soon.
The house was built in the ca 1938 and the detached linked rear/side garage was converted in ca 2003 according to the homebuyers' survey. I believe it is the 2003 work that potentially caused the problem.
This seems strange that this would not have been dealt with when the former garage was converted.
Could it be a mistake on the plan? Or is it conceivable that the builders took a short cut and built over the manhole?
Thanks for any thoughts/assistance/help you can provide. I've asked the solicitors to also enquire via the vendors.
I am in the process of purchasing a new house.
The house has planning permission approved for a small rear extension. The solicitors advised that I would also need permission from the water/sewerage company as the extension would run over an existing sewerage drain.
When I phoned Thames Water about this, they advised that this should not be a problem as long as there is 0.5metres of space between the sewer and the foundations, and that I'd need 3 weeks or so to get official permission should I proceed with the extension, which is fine. However, they flagged a larger potential problem which is that the plan indicates that a manhole somehow appears to be within what used to be the garage (and is now habitable space). The informed me that should I proceed with the extension, I would have to have the manhole moved at my own cost and probably have the sewer rerouted.
As I don't have many posts, unfortunately the forum isn't allowing me to attach a photo of the plan or link to a hosted image online but I'll reply to some other posts (helpfully!) and hopefully it will allow me to do so soon.
The house was built in the ca 1938 and the detached linked rear/side garage was converted in ca 2003 according to the homebuyers' survey. I believe it is the 2003 work that potentially caused the problem.
This seems strange that this would not have been dealt with when the former garage was converted.
Could it be a mistake on the plan? Or is it conceivable that the builders took a short cut and built over the manhole?
Thanks for any thoughts/assistance/help you can provide. I've asked the solicitors to also enquire via the vendors.
0
Comments
-
It's entirely possible that there's a manhole within the garage, yes.
What's the flooring in the converted garage? Is there anything visible, or "feelable" under carpet?0 -
It used to be perfectly acceptable to build over inspection chambers. It isn't now.
The drains on a house built after 1936 would have been private and the responsibility of the homeowner, until 2011 when all shared drains were adopted by the water companies.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
It's entirely possible that there's a manhole within the garage, yes.
What's the flooring in the converted garage? Is there anything visible, or "feelable" under carpet?
Thanks for this.
The area shown on the plan as having the manhole is tiled, as far as I recollect, which may well cover up any issues. Nothing was visible when we last viewed it and the surveyor didn't flag it as a potential concern. But as it's tiled, it probably wouldn't be visible or "feelable".0 -
Tiled could be good. Tiled may well mean that the cover has been swapped for a proper internal-spec sealed one, which has been tiled over properly.
Done well, they can be hard to spot at a glance.
Or some hideous bodger may just have tiled over it blithely, of course...0 -
Doozergirl wrote: »It used to be perfectly acceptable to build over inspection chambers. It isn't now.
The drains on a house built after 1936 would have been private and the responsibility of the homeowner, until 2011 when all shared drains were adopted by the water companies.
Good to know. Which might explain this.0 -
Tiled could be good. Tiled may well mean that the cover has been swapped for a proper internal-spec sealed one, which has been tiled over properly.
Done well, they can be hard to spot at a glance.
Or some hideous bodger may just have tiled over it blithely, of course...
Possibly. I didn't clock it when I viewed the house but it might be done quite subtly. I think it's probably worth having another viewing in any case so I'll take a look then.
The gentleman from Thames Water, who seemed clued up, said that they wouldn't permit an internal inspection nowadays - I presume as they might require access without contacting us, in theory.
My wife has just reviewed the surveyor's photos and she noticed that an inspection chamber exists on the driveway in front of the garage - probably about 2 metres away from the manhole indicated on the plan. Would that be in addition to the manhole shown on the plan, do you think?0 -
Could well be an addition. Or it may have been moved. There's really only one way you're going to find out.0
-
So did the gov't deem every house in the UK with internal drain unsellable when they changed the regs?
Or do sellers just hope the buyers solictor is useless ( most are) and sell it as seen.0 -
So did the gov't deem every house in the UK with internal drain unsellable when they changed the regs?
Or do sellers just hope the buyers solictor is useless ( most are) and sell it as seen.
The thread is from August, you really could have just linked to the thread rather than dragging it up.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards