Residential PCN help please - ***I WON***

KeithP

amateurgirl said:

Thanks CM.
Sorry if this is a stupid question but when you say I need to cover it and attach a new N180, I'm not sure what you're asking me to do exactly? Where am I sending it and what am I attaching it to?

You need to send an email to the court where your claim is currently allocated.
That email needs to tell the court that you have moved since completing your original N180 and tell them your current address. You need to download a N180, fill it in specifying where you want the claim to be transferred to. Attach that completed N180 to the email.

farmasiyen

Thank you.

KeithP

@farmasiyen, what is your interest in this thread?

amateurgirl

Yes, and I could say the same for 'Castle' who has also thanked you. 

KeithP

But the difference is that farmasiyen has only made four identical posts, all of them today, spread across the MSE forum. A classic sign of a spammer building a post count ready to spam the boards.

Castle

amateurgirl said:

Yes, and I could say the same for 'Castle' who has also thanked you. 

I was "thanking" KeithP for giving you the appropriate advice about contacting your current allocated court.

amateurgirl

Hello all
I've been reading with interest the posts about the BW Legal 'win' against the Abuse of Process strike-out. As my supplementary WS rests on the very strike-outs that BW have 'won' against, I'm now thinking I should amend it to refer to, and debunk, this 'win'. There are comments in the various posts that I think I could use, but if anyone has yet come up with a "one-liner to throw at a BWL rent-a-mouth to stop him/her in their tracks", I'd be grateful to see it. 
Thanks all.     

nosferatu1001

No!
READ AGAIN
They won one strike out. one
They picked a weak defendant, not where they would come up against a proper rep. If youve already filed it, dont send yet another one in. Deal with it on the day, when you can point out they chose to only appeal one of the 2 striek outs granted in the same day, against someone who wasnt represented,

Umkomaas

amateurgirl said:

Hello all
I've been reading with interest the posts about the BW Legal 'win' against the Abuse of Process strike-out. As my supplementary WS rests on the very strike-outs that BW have 'won' against, I'm now thinking I should amend it to refer to, and debunk, this 'win'. There are comments in the various posts that I think I could use, but if anyone has yet come up with a "one-liner to throw at a BWL rent-a-mouth to stop him/her in their tracks", I'd be grateful to see it. 
Thanks all.     

The BWL 'win' was only related to the Semark-Jullien case (one of the co-defendants in the Southampton case). The Southampton judgment in relation to the other co-defendant (Crosby) still stands. As do the dozens of other similar judgments throughout England and Wales. Much of a non-event! 

KeithP

Just adding to the last two replies...

BWL only won that one case because it was felt that the strike out decision was made without the original Judge having enough information to base his decision on. It was made based on a very very weak Defence filed by Semark-Jullien.

Of course that can never happen against anyone following the guidance provided here.