When will fossil fuel useage peak a general discussion

Martyn1981

GreatApe wrote: »

What's with adding fact in front of an aim? What does it achieve other than to try and confuse your readers into pushing your views and values as necessities?

The current aim (which can change) is that we will try to reduce fossil consumption towards zero by 2050

Correct, the current aim is zero by 2050. That's a fact, so to work to any other standard would be somewhat silly.

Not just my views and values, I think you'll find they are shared by the majority of humanity who accept the science of AGW and the impact of FF emissions on health.

You may disagree, but as I've said many times - you are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

Since your opinions are neither green nor ethical, I fail to understand why you continue to promote them on this board. Just because the troll demands that those ignoring you should pay you more respect, it doesn't change the 'fact' that your views, opinions and presentation are neither green nor ethical.

Since I've now had to repeat myself a number of times, remind you of what you have stated (when you deny it), explain basics like FF's and bio-energy, and the fact that we are currently constrained (thank goodness) by the need to operate to a zero emission standard, I can't see any point in continuing with this discussion further.