📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SVS Securities - shut down?

1647648649650651653»

Comments

  • Madmel said:
    I know this is an old thread but I just wanted some information. I have just been contacted on my landline by a claims management company called Gains Clark. They knew all about my dealings with SVS. Apparently they are offering a "no win, no fee" claim to the FSCS in respect of the dodgy dealings advice and losses I incurred from SVS. In return they take 25% of any compensation.

    I will read the details later but does any wise MSE-er have any advice for me? As I had mentally written off my losses, the idea of getting some money back is appealing, even if I only get 75% of it. Thoughts are welcome. TIA 
    I was also contacted by Gains Clark some months ago but haven't done anything as yet, regarding SVS stockbroking bad practice.  Has anyone had any successful dealings with Gains Clark regarding SVS reclaims? 
  • RasputinB
    RasputinB Posts: 317 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-takes-action-against-three-individuals-svs-securities-mistreatment-pension-funds

    "These three individuals and SVS were a central part of a tangled web which concealed the fact that customers’ pension money was being invested into high-risk bonds. Customers were entitled to trust that SVS would act in their best interests, but it repeatedly prioritised income for itself and its associates."
  • I had thankfully nearly forgotten all about this nasty little episode in my life but I recently received a call out the blue from the Kansas office of Marsh McLennan,  who tell me I am entitled to compensation and that they are acting for the FCA.  It sounds like a load of old testicles to me and I suspect they are a bunch of ambulance chasers, but their web sites suggest they are legit.  I have put them off for now but if it is kosher and worth pursuing, I will need to sign in blood and I am risk averse in these matters.  Has anyone got any clue what this is and whether or not I should even consider it? 
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,489 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 6 June at 5:36PM
    FSCS apparently not making as much progress as anticipated:
    We will provide another update in March 2025.
    https://www.fscs.org.uk/making-a-claim/failed-firms/svs/
  • Nighthawks
    Nighthawks Posts: 1 Newbie
    First Anniversary First Post
    I know this is an old thread and that I am clutching at straws. I have made a claim against SVS and I am at the 2nd appeal stage with the FSCS. My claim is that I was not told that SVS were selling shares to me with a markup. I only discovered this when I was contacted in 2019 by one of the claims companies mentioned in the thread above. Before starting my claim, which I made in Aug 2020, I sent a DSAR to Leonard Curtis, the liquidators. When I made my claim to the FSCS I included not only all the paperwork I had but also the paperwork I received from issuing the DSAR. Amongst my paperwork were the Purchase Contract notes I received when I bought the shares. The DSAR paperwork also had the Purchase Contract notes but in a different format. The latter included details about the markup NOT included on the originals. In my last appeal I sent copies of both of these to the FSCS to try to show that SVS had not told me about the markup. They said as I sent them Contract notes in both formats that they have no way of knowing when I received them so they would not uphold my claim.
    I have an email with an file attached dated Aug 2020 which is the data from the DSAR. I thought this might prove that I received the Purchase notes in the second format (the ones with the markup details) after SVS went into liquidation, proving I didn't know this until then. However I have become very cynical and I therefore think that FSCS will say that this still isn't proof as I may have seen or even received the Purchase notes in the second format prior to the DSAR. It is not in their interest to uphold my claim as that would make me eligible to compensation. I am therefore struggling to know how best to proceed. 
    The purpose of posting this is to find out if anyone has made a successful claim to the the FSCS on this basis or indeed in any other way. Is my cynicism well founded? 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.