We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SVS Securities - shut down?

15253555758651

Comments

  • Likewise. All 3 accounts agree. One of my (larger) shareholdings was under a scheme of arrangement which closed a week after SVS was shut down. In the statement no value has been given to the number of shares I was holding. Their covering letter notes that funds received as a result of corporate actions "continue to be held on trust on your behalf by the Administrators" so I hope this is the case although it does put a serious dent in the overall value of my holdings!
  • Anyone else still waiting? Not yet received details of my ISA account
  • Voting

    Although we haven't hear what the proposals are from LC - the amount of money they take from the accounts will be reviewed and scrutinised by the FCA before any FSCS is applied. Looking at Beaufort Securities .PwC ended up with roughly 10% (hence my "musings" above).

    I have nowhere near 850k in my account so any "loss" as a result of paying for LC's services is not going to exceed the compensation limits.

    Overall then, I will very likely be voting to accept LC's proposals, hoping that one of the 11 candidates is appointed to takeover the clients accounts.

    For the average shareholder (with assets of less than £850k...why would one not accept?)
  • Desertorchid....I spoke to LC on the phone yesterday - they simply said that there's 21000 accounts to deal with and they have to break the work down into batches.

    Did you get a letter for each of your accounts.? .if so then they know you have the accounts and I guess it'll be just a matter of time til you receive the info.
  • I note that there were dividends from Vodafone and British Land due on August 2nd 2019 . These look to have been correctly accounted for in the cash balance information received from LC.
  • Since all investments seem to match our records, why was SVS shut down?
  • Since all investments seem to match our records, why was SVS shut down?

    There has been discussion on this already on earlier postings. Here's a snippet from CityWire

    "The company was closed by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over ‘repeated serious breaches’ at the beginning of last month.The regulator later said it ‘had serious concerns over the integrity of certain SVS directors’, with the firm appearing to have invested pensioner client funds in high-risk companies in return for disguised payments."

    And in the FT

    https://www.ftadviser.com/your-industry/2019/09/13/failed-wealth-manager-circled-by-100-firms/
  • manted
    manted Posts: 126 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Going by the comments on the forum so far, everyone on the XO side of things have their positions in line with what they would expect.
    If that's the case - is there any need for LC to engage 3rd parties to verify the records as they seem to suggest in the letters.
    Would it not be better to get forensic analysis done only when any discrepancies discovered ? I would imagine people will shout when the portal is up & if they find any gaps.
    What I am after is the 1st Objective they have mentioned - ensuring return of assets as quickly as possible . If there's no complications on the Xo side, maybe they could save costs and time for all involved.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,903 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    leonde wrote: »
    Isn't the FSCS protection limit £85,000 not £850,000?
    Indeed, but the point being made was that if an assumption is made that administrator costs equate to 10% of assets, then it's only those with more than £850K that would suffer losses of more than £85K, i.e. beyond what FSCS would make good....
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Spoke with LSE, this trade is now outside of SVS & LC, and in my case stocks & shares ISA. The counterparty (seller I think) will contact me to settle the trade, this means I am going to have to pay again and reclaim my original purchase price back from LC or FSCS.

    Yes sounds messy have you asked SVS/LC if they would consider settling the trade using the money that is in your client account which was intended for this purpose?

    https://www.londonstockexchange.com/traders-and-brokers/rules-regulations/default-information/svs-securities-plc/svs-securities-plc.htm
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.