We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
SVS Securities - shut down?
Comments
-
shiznit76 said:what number did you call accounts management on?
1 -
My MP (Tobias Ellwood) has just sent me the response he received from the FCA - as expected it was two pages full of 'fingerrhea' (I think this is the written equivalent to verbal diarrhea) but thought the following extracts might amuse some of you:
Role of the special administrators
The special administrators have 3 statutory objectives, one of which is to ensure the return of client assets (including client money) as soon as is reasonably practicable. To complete this, they are required to reconcile the client accounts and identify what monies and assets are held on behalf of each individual. Due to the number of clients invested with SVS this process was expected to take several months !!!!!!
Transfer of client assets to ITI Capital Limited
We are aware that a number !!!!! of former SVS clients, including ............. and her family, have experienced difficulties accessing their assets with ITI and in attempting to transfer their assets to an alternative provider. This is a consequence of IT system failings and errors which ITI has been working
to resolve.
My response: I suppose 18,000 is a number.
"Our regulations require ITI to safeguard client money and assets"
My response: They certainly did that, just a pity we couldn't see or access them.!!
......... and taking steps to ensure they do not suffer financial detriment as a consequence of ITI’s actions.
Eh right......my bank balance says different !
Hope this has brightened up your day.......tomorrow we start all over again.
2 -
In its FAQ,s as early as I November 2019 LC had established that SVS's client records were accurate:"Q. Are my Client Assets safe?A. We have brought in third party experts to check that the Company's records tally with the Client Assets it actually holds. That exercise is now complete and no material discrepancies between the Company's records and the Client Assets actually held by it have been identified.We have also taken control of the Client Assets held by the Company. This includes transferring Client Money to new trust bank accounts.So that reconcilliation was achieved in just a few weeks. It is now almost a year since 1 November 2019 and a lot of former SVS client records are now in a WORSE state than they were then!
10 -
shiznit76 said:are those unfortunate enough to still have a Qort account finding that their values of holdings are still wrong?
1 -
Jamesram said:In its FAQ,s as early as I November 2019 LC had established that SVS's client records were accurate:"Q. Are my Client Assets safe?A. We have brought in third party experts to check that the Company's records tally with the Client Assets it actually holds. That exercise is now complete and no material discrepancies between the Company's records and the Client Assets actually held by it have been identified.We have also taken control of the Client Assets held by the Company. This includes transferring Client Money to new trust bank accounts.So that reconcilliation was achieved in just a few weeks. It is now almost a year since 1 November 2019 and a lot of former SVS client records are now in a WORSE state than they were then!0
-
Sheris not sure if I am fully understanding your question- the FAQ extract I cite is is from an LC download of FAQs dated 1 November 2019This follows an LC 12 Sept 2109 update letter, which stated: " We have engaged specialist third-party auditors to assist the JSAs in carrying out a reconciliation of client money and custody assets from Company records to the market systems and bank accounts. Whilst there are several thousand clients, the reconciliation exercise should be completed shortly and we will keep you informed as to its progress.So sometime between these two dates the exercise was carried out by an auditor/accountant- the firm name is in the documents somewhere- and LC were then able to confirm to us that Client Assets were as SVS had recorded.To be fully clear, if pedantic, the FAQ possibly addressed the "global" issue of total Client Assets. However, that reconcilliation can surely only have been arrived at by checking and combining all the assets held in individual client accounts.In any case by 27 November 2019 the matter is put beyond argument because on that date the Client Portal was made available for individuals to check their own holdings against the account records posted online by LC.
1 -
Jamesram said:Sheris not sure if I am fully understanding your question- the FAQ extract I cite is is from an LC download of FAQs dated 1 November 2019This follows an LC 12 Sept 2109 update letter, which stated: " We have engaged specialist third-party auditors to assist the JSAs in carrying out a reconciliation of client money and custody assets from Company records to the market systems and bank accounts. Whilst there are several thousand clients, the reconciliation exercise should be completed shortly and we will keep you informed as to its progress.So sometime between these two dates the exercise was carried out by an auditor/accountant- the firm name is in the documents somewhere- and LC were then able to confirm to us that Client Assets were as SVS had recorded.To be fully clear, if pedantic, the FAQ possibly addressed the "global" issue of total Client Assets. However, that reconcilliation can surely only have been arrived at by checking and combining all the assets held in individual client accounts.In any case by 27 November 2019 the matter is put beyond argument because on that date the Client Portal was made available for individuals to check their own holdings against the account records posted online by LC.0
-
Jamesram said:Sheris not sure if I am fully understanding your question- the FAQ extract I cite is is from an LC download of FAQs dated 1 November 2019This follows an LC 12 Sept 2109 update letter, which stated: " We have engaged specialist third-party auditors to assist the JSAs in carrying out a reconciliation of client money and custody assets from Company records to the market systems and bank accounts. Whilst there are several thousand clients, the reconciliation exercise should be completed shortly and we will keep you informed as to its progress.So sometime between these two dates the exercise was carried out by an auditor/accountant- the firm name is in the documents somewhere- and LC were then able to confirm to us that Client Assets were as SVS had recorded.To be fully clear, if pedantic, the FAQ possibly addressed the "global" issue of total Client Assets. However, that reconcilliation can surely only have been arrived at by checking and combining all the assets held in individual client accounts.In any case by 27 November 2019 the matter is put beyond argument because on that date the Client Portal was made available for individuals to check their own holdings against the account records posted online by LC.1
-
I have today received the cash amount from my ITI non-ISA account into my Jarvis XO account. However, I do not think this includes any dividends I have received recently as my ITI qort account does not seem to be up to date on my expected dividends. Oh well one small step at a time...2
-
Josl at 8.47 pm 18 Oct you said "Clients were asked to fill out Client-Claim-Form-and-Proxy-Forms on 25-Sept. Reconciliation must have completed prior to this event."Hesitate to be even more pedantic but LC's Notice to Clients on 26 September 2019 said that:"These statements will contain details of clients’ holdings (being custody assets and client monies) as at 5 August 2019. Please note that client statements are indicative and are provided to clients for information.purposes only. They are a record of Clients' stated holdings according to the Company’s records available immediately prior to the Joint Special Administrators’ appointment on 5 August 2019 and have not been independently verified.I do agree though that LC had clearly established to their own satisfaction very shortly after their appointment in August 2019 that SVS account records were very probably entirely accurate - the subsequent "Reconciliation" by a third-party firm having been more of a formality, and probably required under the Special Administration Rules.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards