We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
court papers arrived
Options

brewdog
Posts: 21 Forumite

And now the end is near!
since 2015 premier parks have been chasing an outstanding parking ticket
i entered a car park at the back of a pub to pick up my dad and give him a lift home
i was there 17 mins,there were around 10 parking bays off to the right managed by premier parks which i presumed were there for people to use for a length of time (wrong!):(
when i entered the parking area they had the traditional pub signs ,one reading PARKING FOR PATRONS ONLY,which i would interpret as free parking (dad was in pub)so i have had the paper trail of letters from premier parks,wright hassle solicitors,bw legal, now northampton court papers
the interesting bit is that since 2017 the CAMERAS and PARKING signs have been removed from site,the pub has been closed for the last 3 months,currently boarded up....
have PREMIER PARKS been complacent in claiming this money,as circumstances have changed with their client and landowner,after all how can they pay the landlord his fee when he has upped tools and gone??
i have the usual phone call per day from BW legal
comments appreciated
since 2015 premier parks have been chasing an outstanding parking ticket
i entered a car park at the back of a pub to pick up my dad and give him a lift home
i was there 17 mins,there were around 10 parking bays off to the right managed by premier parks which i presumed were there for people to use for a length of time (wrong!):(
when i entered the parking area they had the traditional pub signs ,one reading PARKING FOR PATRONS ONLY,which i would interpret as free parking (dad was in pub)so i have had the paper trail of letters from premier parks,wright hassle solicitors,bw legal, now northampton court papers
the interesting bit is that since 2017 the CAMERAS and PARKING signs have been removed from site,the pub has been closed for the last 3 months,currently boarded up....
have PREMIER PARKS been complacent in claiming this money,as circumstances have changed with their client and landowner,after all how can they pay the landlord his fee when he has upped tools and gone??
i have the usual phone call per day from BW legal
comments appreciated
0
Comments
-
the fact that its all gone now is irrelevant, it was all there on the incident date and PP have 6 years to bring this court claim
read post #2 of the NEWBIES FAQ sticky thread , same as everyone else
and post the ISSUE DATE of the claim form below
then email a SAR to the DPO at PP asap with a pic of the claim form as proof of ID0 -
thanks for the reply-whats an SAR who is the DPO, when you write PP do you mean premier park-i found some info on the forum about a district judge ruling in southampton court for abuse of process against BW legal she threw out their claim0
-
A guide to all the acronyms can be found on the Newbies thread, post #5Things that are differerent: draw & drawer, brought & bought, loose & lose, dose & does, payed & paid0
-
i have a copy of the directions questionnaire from BW legal- it states no witness?? is that right? and no allocation fee? they also ticked mediation but i denied that part- any comments- thanks brewdog0
-
Read the bargepole post again , it's clear you are not doing so
Wait for the DQ from the CCBC0 -
i have a copy of the directions questionnaire from BW legal- it states no witness?? is that right? and no allocation fee? they also ticked mediation but i denied that part- any comments- thanks brewdog
they also ticked mediation
These dodgy legals know that mediation is a cheapo way to a 50% win or lose with no egg on their faces
So when they tick this option, even in the crazy world they live in, they know they about to get another whooping in court.
80% chance they will discontinue.
That's the problem with Robo claim outfits like BWLegal, they file rubbish claims with no clue of the facts. Then they try all sorts of tricks, discounts, mediation to placate themselves.
You have the facts so go forth and get them whooped in court again ........ don't forget your costs.
BWLegal are a very bad "carry on" film0 -
thanks guys-ill read bargepole again,great work on here0
-
one last question ?burning near midnight oil!! i disallowed mediation ,they requested mediation, so we disagree -does this mean we can go to court???0
-
if it gets that far and they pay the fee0
-
theyll pay the hearing fee, they may then discontinue.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards