We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Claim Form but not the driver
Comments
-
Stupidly I didn't but I will email them again to ask if the hearing can be moved to a court somewhere between the Claimant and ourselves and I will include the proof of posting then.0
-
No, ask for it to be moved to the court nearest you
PHONE THEM - not email.0 -
I have had a very interesting document sent to me from QDR Solicitors. It is a breakdown of the account history and communications they have had with the PPC about this claim. In it they disclose:
via a transcript of an email the PPC have no photographic evidence that there was no ticket on display in the vehicle.
via notes about private calls from the PPC that:
- They are not able to get any metric data from the payment machine to prove that a ticket wasn't purchased
- They are not able to supply copies of the PCN and NTK that has been issued but can only supply QDR with templates that would have been sent
- They believe the POCs to not be POFA compliant
- They believe the NTK is non POFA compliant
- They state that they should pursue the driver and not the keeper
- That ZZPS confirmed that they were aware that the NTK is non compliant
- They want to settle for £60 but don't want to be out of pocket
QDR also question whether they should discontinue the claim.
The client also instructed QDR to try to settle with us which they have not done.
With all this info at my finger tips do you think I should put pressure on them to discontinue using this information against them?0 -
Wow, I wonder if you should have had that; was it as a result of a SAR?0
-
Yes it was!0
-
As a matter of interest is the "metric" theirs or your wording?
"They are not able to get any metric data from the payment machine"0 -
With all this info at my finger tips do you think I should put pressure on them to discontinue using this information against them?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
That was their wording0
-
I thought it was - love it that they've handed you this on a plate! USE IT AS LEVERAGE!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
If it were me, I'd write to them and give them 7 days to discontinue, failing which, I would then apply to strike out the claim, relying upon their own disclosure and claim your costs of the application and in the defence of the action.
That's aggressive and it's not necessarily an approach everyone should take - the application would cost £255, but the fee should be recoverable.
Or, you tell them that at any hearing you shall make a submission of "no case to answer" - ie this is nonsense and whatever he says can't remedy the documents already exchanged that show there is no evidence.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards