We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rent a Room Scheme - mobile home

2»

Comments

  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    for tax purposes there is no definitive guidance over a "caravan" being used as part of the "main" home for RAR purposes

    whether that is because it is an issue that it is categorically a separate residence or whether it is simply a grey area issue that no one has written on, I have no idea

    there is a hint at the former issue in the guidance regarding whether a single building is still subject to RAR if a part of it has been let, ie whether a building has been divided into separate residences. I suspect that the principles set out here would end up being tested in court if HMRC so chose if you claim RAR on a "detached" residence, aka a mobile home in your garden
    https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/property-income-manual/pim4004

    please note the tax rules and the planning rules have nothing whatsoever to do with each other
  • seven-day-weekend
    seven-day-weekend Posts: 36,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Comms69 wrote: »
    I don’t see why you’d need either of those - not a permanent structure and use is still residential

    If the mobile home is self-contained with all the facilities (mains water, sewage etc) , and someone lives in it and uses these facilities, then it is classed as a separate dwelling and planning permission would be required.

    If it does not have separate facilities and someone lives in it but uses the services in the main house, then it is classed as ancillary to the main dwelling (like a spare bedroom) and would not require PP.

    That is my understanding. The legislation may have changed since I worked in Town Planning in days of yore :)
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • unforeseen
    unforeseen Posts: 7,413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    But in this case it has seperate facilities but they are not being used. So it is an attempt to circumvent the regulations by saying the facilities aren't being used and also fraudulently claim rent a room allowance.

    ETA

    And also denying the tenant the security of an AST.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    If the mobile home is self-contained with all the facilities (mains water, sewage etc) , and someone lives in it and uses these facilities, then it is classed as a separate dwelling and planning permission would be required.

    If it does not have separate facilities and someone lives in it but uses the services in the main house, then it is classed as ancillary to the main dwelling (like a spare bedroom) and would not require PP.

    That is my understanding. The legislation may have changed since I worked in Town Planning in days of yore :)



    Thank you :) very helpful and I've learned something
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.