Britannia/BWLegal: Another claim struck out for Abuse of Process

Mahershalalhashbaz

Good news from the County Court at Southampton.

I have received a 'General Form of Judgment or Order' to the effect that the claim from Britannia against me has been struck out as they had submitted an knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. :j

I had submitted my defence to this claim, but this case had not proceeded to a hearing.

beamerguy

Mahershalalhashbaz wrote: »

Good news from the County Court at Southampton.

I have received a 'General Form of Judgment or Order' to the effect that the claim from Britannia against me has been struck out as they had submitted an knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. :j

I had submitted my defence to this claim, but this case had not proceeded to a hearing.

BWLegal with their fake claims, poor old Britannia for allowing such rubbish to go to court

What is the case number and the name of the judge please

Added to the ABUSE OF PROCESS thread ... post #1
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

Mahershalalhashbaz

beamerguy wrote: »

Added to the ABUSE OF PROCESS thread ... post #1
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

Thanks for adding to that thread. Here is a link to a redacted version of the Order:

http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=82477356814329133754

District Judge Grand can be added to the list of those who have responded decisively to BWLegal inflating their claims. I am grateful to him for saving me the trouble of preparing a witness statement.

For those wishing to refer to this decision in their own cases, the claim number is: F0DP163T
Perhaps I shouldn't have redacted that part of the form.

Umkomaas

Please complain to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) that their member BW Legal is artificially (and knowingly) inflating claims with spurious sums, causing Judges to strike out on the basis of 'Abuse of Process'.

Please ask them to investigate and bring this malicious, wide scale (GB-wide) attempt to deceive motorists and the courts that the additional amounts are legitimate and legally due.

beamerguy

Umkomaas wrote: »

Please complain to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) that their member BW Legal is artificially (and knowingly) inflating claims with spurious sums, causing Judges to strike out on the basis of 'Abuse of Process'.

Please ask them to investigate and bring this malicious, wide scale (GB-wide) attempt to deceive motorists and the courts that the additional amounts are legitimate and legally due.

100% agree

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems.page

The_Deep

Could this be the thin end of the wedge?

Coupon-mad

Mahershalalhashbaz wrote: »

Thanks for adding to that thread. Here is a link to a redacted version of the Order:

http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=82477356814329133754

District Judge Grand can be added to the list of those who have responded decisively to BWLegal inflating their claims. I am grateful to him for saving me the trouble of preparing a witness statement.

For those wishing to refer to this decision in their own cases, the claim number is: F0DP163T
Perhaps I shouldn't have redacted that part of the form.

Gotta love DJ Grand! Thanks for the claim number too, and the link.

:T

kessik

Mine was looked at by Justice Giddins at Southampton and it's going ahead

Egbert_Nobacon

Hi Kessik can you start your own thread and let us know if you included the ABUSE OF PROCESS in your defence.

If not at least you can work it into your witness statement.

Good luck with this.

KeithP

Egbert, kessik already has their own thread.

Egbert_Nobacon

Thanks Keith for info