📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Some drivers!!

Options
24

Comments

  • George_Michael
    George_Michael Posts: 4,251 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    a.turner wrote: »
    Are you sure?

    Well, this is what the act states as the meaning of a road:
    road”
    (a)in relation to England and Wales, means any highway and any other road to which the public has access, and includes bridges over which a road passes
    Car_54 wrote: »
    Under which section of the Act?


    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/192
  • a.turner
    a.turner Posts: 655 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Well, this is what the act states as the meaning of a road:

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/section/192

    The public have access so it's still a road.
  • George_Michael
    George_Michael Posts: 4,251 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    a.turner wrote: »
    The public have access so it's still a road.

    But not legal access if it's closed off.

    Using your logic, I could drive to an airport in a low slung sports car, drive under a security barrier (I know someone who owned a Caterham 7 and could do this), and then proceed to drive on the perimeter road and would still be legally insured if I was to smash into a parked aircraft.

    The public have access to the road leading to my house by opening a gate. Does this mean that this access road is classed as having public access and that it would be illegal to drive a Sorned vehicle on it?
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,851 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But not legal access if it's closed off.
    But the point is that the road is not closed to the public, it is closed to vehicles.

    In any case a temporary closure doesn’t stop it being a road. That is akin to claiming that a broken-down vehicle doesn’t need tax and insurance, because it is temporarily not mechanically driven. That doesn’t work either.
  • a.turner
    a.turner Posts: 655 Forumite
    500 Posts
    But not legal access if it's closed off.

    Using your logic, I could drive to an airport in a low slung sports car, drive under a security barrier (I know someone who owned a Caterham 7 and could do this), and then proceed to drive on the perimeter road and would still be legally insured if I was to smash into a parked aircraft.

    The public have access to the road leading to my house by opening a gate. Does this mean that this access road is classed as having public access and that it would be illegal to drive a Sorned vehicle on it?

    So the Tenby marathon runners were all trespassing?

    Bit ridiculous about an airport as it's not a road.

    As for the road to your house is it maintainable at public expense? If not you don't need tax and SORN is irrelevant.
  • Richard53
    Richard53 Posts: 3,173 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If a road is totally closed to both vehicles and the general public then this might be the case but as the road in question was being used by people running (or walking) a marathon, then the vehicle's insurers must still honour the policy.

    This is because according to the RTA, it is a legal requirement for a motor vehicle that is being used on a road or other public place to have a minimum of 3rd party insurance.



    I wonder if tacpot12 is thinking of someone who drives onto a closed road (e.g. closed by police after flooding) and wrecks the car, and the insurers refuse to pay out for the damage? I'm sure I have heard of that happening. Nothing to do with RTA.
    If someone is nice to you but rude to the waiter, they are not a nice person.
  • George_Michael
    George_Michael Posts: 4,251 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Car_54 wrote: »
    But the point is that the road is not closed to the public, it is closed to vehicles.

    I agree with that point but that wasn't what I was originally responding to.
    I stated that if a road is closed to the public then according to the RTA, it doesn't qualify as a road for the purposes of that act
    If it is temporarily closed to the public then as far as the Road Traffic Act is concerned, it no longer qualifies as a road.
    and the response to this was:
    a.turner wrote: »
    Are you sure?

    To be honest, I think we are discussing different things, so we aren't really ever going to agree.
  • a.turner
    a.turner Posts: 655 Forumite
    500 Posts
    I agree with that point but that wasn't what I was originally responding to.
    I stated that if a road is closed to the public then according to the RTA, it doesn't qualify as a road for the purposes of that act


    and the response to this was:


    To be honest, I think we are discussing different things, so we aren't really ever going to agree.

    Because you're wrong.
  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,261 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 July 2019 at 10:48PM
    a.turner wrote: »
    I didn't know that, is it something you've heard some time ago or just made it up?

    I was told it by a Policeman. I was marshalling for a road race, and was told by the Policeman that I should advise motorists arriving at the Road Closed signs that if they proceeded beyond it, their insurance would be invalid as they were not driving on a public road. I never thought to question this until now, but being curious I have checked and the Road Traffic Act 1988, s 192(1) does indeed define (in England) a road as any highway to which the public has access. if the road is Closed, it is not a road (the clue in the words written on the sign "Road Closed"), and therefore driving on it is not covered unless you insurance policy covers you for off-road driving.

    Arguing that the public has access to the road, and therefore the road isn't closed, means you are arguing that no road can ever be closed to allow for a public event. Is this really the situation you want to achieve?
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • a.turner
    a.turner Posts: 655 Forumite
    500 Posts
    tacpot12 wrote: »
    I was told it by a Policeman. I was marshalling for a road race, and was told by the Policeman that I should advise motorists arriving at the Road Closed signs that if they proceeded beyond it, their insurance would be invalid as they were not driving on a public road. I never thought to question this until now, but being curious I have checked and the Road Traffic Act 1988, s 192(1) does indeed define (in England) a road as any highway to which the public has access. if the road is Closed, it is not a road (the clue in the words written on the sign "Road Closed"), and therefore driving on it is not covered unless you insurance policy covers you for off-road driving.

    Arguing that the public has access to the road, and therefore the road isn't closed, means you are arguing that no road can ever be closed to allow for a public event. Is this really the situation you want to achieve?

    What a load of rubbish, by that logic you need insurance for off road driving every time you pull into a car park because it's not a road.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.