We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why are property prices so different in the north?
Options
Comments
-
Capital cities tend to be like London, Paris, Madrid and the smaller places like Dublin, Copenhagen. They suck the life out of the rest of their countries. Its no secret and nor is the solution. Move functions out. There is no reason for London to be the seat of government anymore, no reason for government departments to be there. Technology has solved that issue the only stumbling block is the political will. The recent farce regarding the cost of repairs to the Houses of Parliment has highlighted all the reasons for a shift out of London.
To be fair that's true of regional capitals too.
IMO the real problem is all the capital investment in London means the rest of the country has to run twice as hard to keep up. Take a look at public transport for example - Manchester, Sheffield, Nottingham all have modern tram systems. Leeds just has congestion.0 -
To be fair that's true of regional capitals too.
IMO the real problem is all the capital investment in London means the rest of the country has to run twice as hard to keep up. Take a look at public transport for example - Manchester, Sheffield, Nottingham all have modern tram systems. Leeds just has congestion.0 -
westernpromise wrote: »Far more tax is raised than is spent in London. Only three regions are net tax contributors, the rest are all tax sinks. The idea that London gets more than its fair share spent there is laughable.
Come on!!!!
Its catch-22. London gets more public funding which then leads to more private funding which leads to greater tax receipts.
Its a completely circular argument. I could equally claim that much of Londons wealth has actually been stolen from the regions, and by giving regions a greater share is a way of correcting that.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards