We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
so excited PPI reclaim

Comments
-
Credit card PPI was listed on every statement as a separate charge so you did know about it. If you didn't want it then why did you wait until 2007 when you had been paying it every month for 8 years? That's why there is a reason to refuse it
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
purely because I had an extreme amount of student dept I was grateful that I had been granted a credit card...I had not had one before .... I did not know that this charge was an optional charge... I was completely naive , at the time having a credit card helped me to pay my bills . If I had known it was optional I would not have had an average of £90 a month on my credit card....the charge could have been used to pay the bill if i had understood what it was.0
-
I did not know that this charge was an optional charge..
You either ticked the box on the application form to say you wanted it or agreed to it when they sold it over the phone when you activated the card, forgetting is not an issue, it's just the reality...my financial situation was dire .....and I was completely naive , at the time having a credit card helped me to pay my bills . If I had known it was optional I would not have had an average of £90 a month on my credit card......
PPI was typically 70-80p per £100 of debt, even if it was £1 per £100 of debt, you're saying you were carrying over £9000 of debt on the card every month? And average? Meaning at times you had £10,000+ debt on the card?
Any which way, just explaining why they only paid you the Plevin commission and why the product wasn't considered miss-soldSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards