We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Driving after a TiA
Options
Can anyone please advise on the regs for driving after a couple of suspected mini strokes ? My DH had a couple of short episodes (no physical problems just 10 minutes or so of confusion and talking absolute rubbish - no memory of what happened after recovery) back in March and again In April. Admitted to hospital each time, barrage of tests showed everything in good nick for his age (89) and no signs of damage anywhere. Consultants diagnosed probable TIA's and medicated for that and said he must not drive for 28 days after the last one. However, they cannot positively confirm the diagnosis and will only say 'probable' and that his brain scan may show a possible pre-disposition to temporal lobe epilepsy (can't get much vaguer than that !)
I have spoken to DVLA and they say he cannot drive for 3 months not 1month and want doctors reports. He is already 2 months into the 3 month period and it will probably take a lot longer to get the reports by the time we complete the form DVLA are sending us and write to the doctors and get reports . i can't find any firm info on their website as to the regs - they say different things in different places and the doctors say something different as well. If anyone else been in a similar situation and can advise I would appreciate it.
I have spoken to DVLA and they say he cannot drive for 3 months not 1month and want doctors reports. He is already 2 months into the 3 month period and it will probably take a lot longer to get the reports by the time we complete the form DVLA are sending us and write to the doctors and get reports . i can't find any firm info on their website as to the regs - they say different things in different places and the doctors say something different as well. If anyone else been in a similar situation and can advise I would appreciate it.
ELITE 5:2
# 42
11st2lbs down to 9st2lbs - another 5lbs gone due to alcohol abuse (head down toilet syndrome)
# 42
11st2lbs down to 9st2lbs - another 5lbs gone due to alcohol abuse (head down toilet syndrome)
0
Comments
-
DVLA's opinion is the one that applies.
The consultant's "28 days" is one opinion, but DVLA's opinion is more cautious.0 -
DVLA's opinion is the one that applies.
The consultant's "28 days" is one opinion, but DVLA's opinion is more cautious.
Thank you. I certainly agree with that but on the DVLA website it does state 28 days. The 3 month period is what I was told over the phone and I can't find that in writing. The person I spoke to was very vague and even after the 3 months i don't know if DH can drive then or if we have to wait for a DVLA decision after they have spoken to his consultant. I just wondered if anyone else had been the n this position.ELITE 5:2
# 42
11st2lbs down to 9st2lbs - another 5lbs gone due to alcohol abuse (head down toilet syndrome)0 -
ON here, DVLA have a reputation for being ridiculously slow at dealing with health issues. People waiting to have their entitlement returned to them often has to wait months.0
-
Mercdriver wrote: »ON here, DVLA have a reputation for being ridiculously slow at dealing with health issues. People waiting to have their entitlement returned to them often has to wait months.
Better that than than depriving others of there entitlement of avoiding other drivers who are not fit to drive.0 -
Keep_pedalling wrote: »Better that than than depriving others of there entitlement of avoiding other drivers who are not fit to drive.
I understand what you are saying. But some people who have been signed off as ready to drive again have on occasion been waiting months. Sure keep people that are not fit to drive off the road, but the system needs to be more efficient for those who have returned to fitness.0 -
I might also point to the age of the driver in question - 89 yrs old...
I'm not saying that somebody of that age is inherently unfit to drive, but there certainly should be some large question marks, especially after something like a series of TIAs have led to a multi-month enforced break from driving.0 -
WHAT IS your real “driving age”? A new online game claims to be able to identify how old you are based on how fast your reactions are at the wheel.
The game records your reaction time within a millisecond and calculates your age by how quickly, or slowly, you react when asked to perform an emergency stop. The predictions are based on the times of 2,000 people aged 18-76.
https://www.driving.co.uk/news/find-out-your-driving-age-in-this-reaction-test-game/
I did the test four times, it was within 5 years each time.0 -
sevenhills wrote: »WHAT IS your real “driving age”? A new online game claims to be able to identify how old you are based on how fast your reactions are at the wheel.
The game records your reaction time within a millisecond and calculates your age by how quickly, or slowly, you react when asked to perform an emergency stop. The predictions are based on the times of 2,000 people aged 18-76.
https://www.driving.co.uk/news/find-out-your-driving-age-in-this-reaction-test-game/
I did the test four times, it was within 5 years each time.
I got 35, 25, 24, 24, 24, 19 and then - not sure if you are a human being - 290 miliseconds.0 -
sevenhills wrote: »WHAT IS your real “driving age”? A new online game claims to be able to identify how old you are based on how fast your reactions are at the wheel.
The game records your reaction time within a millisecond and calculates your age by how quickly, or slowly, you react when asked to perform an emergency stop. The predictions are based on the times of 2,000 people aged 18-76.
https://www.driving.co.uk/news/find-out-your-driving-age-in-this-reaction-test-game/
I did the test four times, it was within 5 years each time.
I did the 'test' several times, not once did the results come near my age, according to the 'results' I'm at least 20years younger than I am :rotfl:0 -
My granddad has had 2 mini strokes recently (just slight numbness in his arm) and it was 28 days from the last episode before he could drive again.
He also had to notify his insurance.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards