We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Woodford Concerns
Comments
- 
            None, AFAIK. Why?
 OK, which funds do they have concerns about now, that they are keeping quiet about, but in 18 months time they'll say "We had concerns 18 months ago yadda yadda ..."?I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
 Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0
- 
            
- 
            Neil Woodford is still rated by Trustnet as one of their Alpha managers, despite being bottom quartile for 5 years vs his peers....
 Perhaps time for a rethink of their methodology as people might start to view the "rating" as utterly meaningless, unless they already do.....
 Yet another scam.0
- 
            gadgetmind wrote: »OK, which funds do they have concerns about now, that they are keeping quiet about, but in 18 months time they'll say "We had concerns 18 months ago yadda yadda ..."?
 Look. If a novice like me could figure out three years ago that there was a lot to be concerned about with WEI, it isn’t really all that difficult to look under the bonnet of the others and work out whether or not you want to invest in them.
 Many other commentators were also dubious about the fund and you can be pretty sure that if any of the other funds have problems, we would be reading about it in the press.0
- 
            
 a few years ago, people were laughing at the idea that HL could get away with "waitrose pricing". now they accept that, but don't like them selling horsemeat. in a few years time, everybody will love their horsemeat, but complain about them putting acid in their mineral waterdividendhero wrote: »Nobody's ever questioned HL's service, it really is top class. But this Woodford saga is a bit like Waitrose being caught selling horsemeat :eek: 0 0
- 
            Telegraph article: Neil Woodford fire sale tops £169m as fund manager battles to reshape portfolio
 Amigo Loans, £57m, goodness me...0
- 
            Selling off the mid-caps is going to raise the proportion of unlisted dodgy holdings within the portfolio.
 Any potential buy in price I was toying with the idea of has now dropped 10%, although the "don't bother at all" voice in my head is growing.0
- 
            Not quite sure why HL is putting pressure on, when they couldn't / didn't take a proper look earlier on.
 https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-7164533/Hargreaves-tells-Woodford-repay-savers-frozen-fund-soon-possible.html
 Stables, doors and horses come to mind.0
- 
            This bilge from HL smacks of pure hypocrisy. Their fingers are all over the Wealth 50 stuff after virtually every other platform had issued a sell, some a long time ago. The situation is simple, get a smaller amount of money back now, or give Woodford a chance to wind things up in an orderly manner, and hopefully get some more money back some time later.
 We are in the reputation damage stage of HL PR puff now, on the side of our customers (which please now forget we misled), bail our customers out quick, preferably before anyone else.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
         
 
          
         