We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Costs and Charges Statement 2.93%?
Options

Davina40
Posts: 46 Forumite


x-o have produced a costs and charges statement. I've not had one before I think this is due to MiFID II.
It's telling me that for the year to December 2018, the product charges were £871.05 or 2.93%. This is made up of £585.90 ongoing costs, £95.93 transaction costs, and £189.62 incidental costs.
My holdings are currently:
Edinburgh Worldwide IT 12.8k
Empiric Student Properties 6.1k
Schroder Asian Total Return 11.8k
The x-o statement doesn't break down the charge by fund.
2.93% sounds high to me. Is it?
It's telling me that for the year to December 2018, the product charges were £871.05 or 2.93%. This is made up of £585.90 ongoing costs, £95.93 transaction costs, and £189.62 incidental costs.
My holdings are currently:
Edinburgh Worldwide IT 12.8k
Empiric Student Properties 6.1k
Schroder Asian Total Return 11.8k
The x-o statement doesn't break down the charge by fund.
2.93% sounds high to me. Is it?
0
Comments
-
2.93% sounds high to me. Is it?
Not for the funds you have, no.
Transaction costs you can largely ignore. They have to be disclosed but they are flawed (part of them includes an element of profit and loss for example). Property funds and specialist/niche funds will tend to have higher transaction charges.
Incidental costs for most people are going to be zero. However, if you utilise non-mainstream or niche/specialist funds, you are going to see figures in that column.
You have no control over TC or IC. The MIFIDII disclosure on these is often more damaging than helpful if you dont understand what you are investing in.
So, in the context of your holdings, it is right.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I got a charges statement from Aberdeen Standard for an investment trust that I hold directly with them, and it had a very high ongoing charge too - over 2% (which is the bulk of your costs). On another money forum I asked if anyone knew how it happened, and we came to the conclusion it is probably 'borrowing costs' - which, yes, may be because of MiFID II. 'Ongoing' seems to have 2 different definitions now:...they often give the ongoing charge figure, which omits transaction costs, performance fees and borrowing charges which are shown in the KID. In one example, total charges in the PRIIPs KID equated to around 3% per annum but the only costs given in the factsheet was the 1.2% annual management charge (AMC)
So if your fund(s) are borrowing (the Edinburgh IT could be, anyway), that could be showing up as a 'cost'.0 -
Thanks for the replies.
It would have been good to get a statement with a breakdown per fund, as it is it's not very informative/helpful. Maybe this is an x-o thing they are no frills after all. Do other brokers send these statements with a breakdown by fund?0 -
Thanks for the replies.
It would have been good to get a statement with a breakdown per fund, as it is it's not very informative/helpful. Maybe this is an x-o thing they are no frills after all. Do other brokers send these statements with a breakdown by fund?
Youinvest can create a Morningstar X-Ray on demand which includes a breakdown of the charge per fund and an aggregate total. However its not accurate as it reports one of my funds have having no charge (when it does). Roughly 0.9% for me0 -
Thanks for the replies.
It would have been good to get a statement with a breakdown per fund, as it is it's not very informative/helpful. Maybe this is an x-o thing they are no frills after all. Do other brokers send these statements with a breakdown by fund?
All the platforms I have seen show it by fund and give a total. So, maybe it is an x-o thing.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Youinvest can create a Morningstar X-Ray on demand which includes a breakdown of the charge per fund and an aggregate total. However its not accurate as it reports one of my funds have having no charge (when it does). Roughly 0.9% for me
The morningstar data is the old OCF. I think the OPs confusion comes from the new MIFID II data. Also one of the OPs funds holds physical property. Clearly the cost of managing property are a lot higher than the costs of looking after a set of share holdings.0 -
Did I understand Trustnet right?
Edinburgh Worldwide IT:
as well as 0.81% OCF
there is an additional management charge of 0.8% per quarter
plus a performance-related management fee paid annually.
Also congrats on the highest risk factor I have ever seen: 232.
Heady stuff.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards