We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Personal Savings Allowance - Higher Tax Bracket Question

Afternoon All

I am really struggling to get my head round this and hope someone can help.

Following a job change, I am now earning slightly into the higher rate tax bracket 2019/20 amounts (£53k). I already do salary sacrifice pension and don't want to contribute any more so no way of reducing under the 40% amount.

Previously, i used to bolster my savings by using a combination of higher rate current accounts and 2-3 regular savers, which earned me around £900 in interest each year, so under the £1000 personal savings allowance at the 20% tax rate. I had ditched ISA's a while back due to the personal allowance. Now i have changed jobs my tax code has been adjusted to claim back tax from savings, as i believe i now have a personal savings allowance of £500, irrespective of how much i earn over £50k.

What i am trying to work out, is it better to carry on going with regular savers/high interest current accounts and accept the extra tax (where previously i earned about £900/year) or should i work it to earn under £500 from current/regular savers and stick the rest in a 1.4% ISA (seems about the best rate at the moment) and avoid tax at all.

Some of Martin's articles seem to imply more interest is still better but i can't get my head around the tax implications...

Thank you for any help
:beer:

Cheers

As i understand it, now i am earning an amount

Comments

  • Dazed_and_confused
    Dazed_and_confused Posts: 6,458 Forumite
    Uniform Washer
    edited 28 April 2019 at 2:53PM
    There is no "allowance" for taxable savings interest.

    Some may be taxed at a 0% tax rate courtesy of the savings nil rate of tax (aka Personal Savings Allowance) so in your situation the tax on £900 would be,

    £500 x 0% = £0.00
    £400 x 40% = £160.00

    Effective tax rate on £900 is c18%

    But if you are in a family receiving Child Benefit then the £900 is part of your adjusted net income which determines any High Income Child Benefit Charge due so you would have an additional 9% of your Child Benefit to repay as a direct result of having this £900 taxable savings interest. So if you get Child Benefit for 3 kids then the HICBC could be more than the income tax payable.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 32,636 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As an example :

    Savings of £36K , earning 2.5% = £900 pa interest Now you have to pay £160 tax so net interest = £740. So the effective interest rate is 2.05%..
    If you change to a cash ISA at 1.4% , you will earn 1.4%. = £504

    Alternatively savings of £20K at 2.5% earns £500 and no tax to pay .
    The remaining £16K at 1.4% in a cash ISA earns £224.
    So £724 by this method, slightly less than by leaving it all in the 2.5% non isa account.
    However if your savings are likely to increase in future then the balance would switch in favour of the latter calculation.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.