We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
cycle/car accident
Comments
-
That means you are going straight ahead.Well - the standard answer is "50/50 unless you have a dashcam"
But it does sound like he was overtaking too close and failed to recognise the signal. The latter being not a big surprise as it will have been read once in the Highway Code as a learner and then promptly forgotten. Many years ago the indicators packed up in my Mk 1 Astra and for the time it took for me to be able to get it looked at - I wound the window down and used an arm. Confused a lot of drivers. Anybody remember what it means when you hold your hand up at shoulder level - palm forward?
Meanwhile - you could always invite him to report it and then answer the door to the police with your arm in a sling
0 -
Police will not be interested, unless you were injured then they may want to know why he was driving so close to you when he overtook.twhitehousescat wrote: »us this an insurance situation , he is claiming "I" smashed his mirror with my hand , it a police job , and that he did not touch or come to close to me ,"We act as though comfort and luxury are the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about” – Albert Einstein0 -
Been many a year since I saw one of those!twhitehousescat wrote: »0 -
twhitehousescat wrote: »it a police job , and that he did not touch or come to close to me ,
So he didn't come close to you yet you were able to reach his mirror!
Do you look like this:
0 -
That Honda's rather cool, if a bit sensible.
(a brace of VeloSolexes here)0 -
-
You seem confused about what you own, it is a moped. Having pedals doesn't make it a bicycle.twhitehousescat wrote: »ok , before we start this is a vintage moped , not a cycle , the moped is 1967 , is pedal assisted and has no brake light indicators fitted , max top speed about 28mph , no speedo fitted
Essentially there are three signals for cyclists:
Ps I do own a car , and after almost 50 yrs of driving have never yet knocked a cyclist off0 -
I have never knocked a moped rider , motorcyclist or a person on a horse off either0
-
shaun_from_Africa wrote: »
OP is saying that is what the other driver is saying i.e. he wasn't close to the OP
Also OP that is not a bicycle, it's got an engineSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
TBF, for these purposes, it's more akin to a bicycle - in not having indicators - than to the vast majority of motorbikes (<50cc or not). It may not even have a brake light - my Solexes, of similar vintage, don't have or legally need them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards




