We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
new HL fund £1
Options
Comments
-
It's a good point that by launching this fund they must have damaged their relationship with Nick Train so do you suspect the LTGE fund discount might be at risk going forward?
Alex
I didn’t make that point but doubt that Train cares. The cost of holding his funds on the HL platform is roughly the same as the new HL fund. Besides, Train owns about 10% of Hargreaves Lansdown so there is a mutual interest.0 -
I'm curious about this statement.
1) what is a good value fund as opposed to HL?
2) is there anything wrong with the HL funds?
Asking because I am thinking of investing in one of their mutli asset income funds and don't want to be a chump etc
Obviously take note of all the disclaimers etc, and I'm sure you'll get the regulars here sneering at them...0 -
HL charge 1.29% for their multi-manager high income fund plus .45% for their platform fee. The each of the sub-funds also has a fee of around 1% so you have to make nearly 2.5% just to break even.
Better just to pick the individual funds.0 -
The sub-fund charges are included in the MM fund charges I believe. Still expensive though.
Not sure about that. Their fund fact sheet states that their size and scale enables them to negotiate discounts from the underlying funds. It was launched just over three years ago and is up a mere 15%. The managers have earned as much as the customer.0 -
Not sure about that. Their fund fact sheet states that their size and scale enables them to negotiate discounts from the underlying funds. It was launched just over three years ago and is up a mere 15%. The managers have earned as much as the customer.Included within the OCF are synthetic costs which include the OCF of the underlying funds weighted on the basis of their investment proportion0
-
Well the constant spamming worked and they took £300m or cica £300 per customer for their amazing £1 launch price opportunity. What a good business they have!0
-
Well the constant spamming worked and they took £300m or cica £300 per customer for their amazing £1 launch price opportunity. What a good business they have!0
-
-
All funds have to start somewhere and the only difference about this one is the fanfare that accompanied it. Personally, I would never invest in a fund without looking under the bonnet and I won’t invest in this one until I can see what’s there. If I like the look of it, I will take a small position but not at the expense of my holdings in Fundsmith, LTGE and Blue Whale.0
-
All funds have to start somewhere and the only difference about this one is the fanfare that accompanied it. Personally, I would never invest in a fund without looking under the bonnet and I won’t invest in this one until I can see what’s there. If I like the look of it, I will take a small position but not at the expense of my holdings in Fundsmith, LTGE and Blue Whale.
We still have no idea what this HL fund is invested in either. Is if a clone of either of these or something totally different.
I hold all three you mention plus the LT UK equity in my HL small SIPP in equalish proportions.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards