We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
End of No Fault Evictions?
Options
Comments
-
-
seven-day-weekend wrote: »Can you evict if you need to sell the property?
In Scotland, yes. But you need to prove it (see my link in the other post) and, presumably, there will be consequences if you lie.
In England? Well, who knows, there isn't much to judge at the moment, but Scotland shows there can be a reasonable compromise between the needs of the landlords and those of the tenants.
Btw, I am in favour of the Scottish system, but not against a system that would make it impossible for landlords to sell or move into their properties.0 -
Perhaps.
If there are sufficient people wanting to buy the kind of property that landlords have been buying.
Remember, many "investment properties" are unmortgageable without spending money on lease extensions, or for other reasons. And, as has been pointed out, LLs buy on yield - which means they're buying the lower-priced properties already.
We're not really talking about the same kind of landlords are we?
I doubt that landlords who own a decent quantity of houses will be so affected by this legislation that they sell up. I imagine, from a limited understanding I will admit, that it will only effect smaller landlords with no more than a handful of properties, who see their landlord business as a bit of a side earner. I presume those kind of landlords are not the ones buying un-mortgageable properties?
I suppose it could result in consolidation of rental properties into large landlord corporations. (That should make them easier to re-nationalise, ahem, pretend I never said that).0 -
I can see this causing a real drop in the quality and diversity of the property available.
The casual small landlord whilst disliked by many often are letting property that would not suit the traditional large landlord who seek best value per Square Meter properties with minimal maintenance.
I think this just fails to tackle the true housing crisis and leaves tenants in a worse position overall than they would have been.0 -
@caprikid1, do you know if any of that has happened in Scotland?
If it has, can you clarify?
If it hasn't, why should England be different?0 -
Re the OP
So will landlords be able to increase rent still?
if not, then that's probably a bigger headline - if so, then presumably this will create circumstances where tenants are forced to decide to leave if they can no longer afford the rent.0 -
SmashedAvacado wrote: »So will landlords be able to increase rent still?0
-
Over the years I have had mostly rogue landlords, it was more they thought they were above the law, or used outdated laws or interpreted them to their own means even had ones intentionally do something like contact council and say I wasn't living there so my benefit would be stopped so would mean I paid late which they used as a excuse to evict me (illegally)
I also think this is a difficult situation, rouge landlords will ignore it and genuine ones will lose out.0 -
SmashedAvacado wrote: »So will landlords be able to increase rent still?
What landlords won't be able to do is say "Sign this new tenancy, at a higher rent, or I'll give you an s21".0 -
I think this just fails to tackle the true housing crisis and leaves tenants in a worse position overall than they would have been.
In itself not an attempt to tackle broader issues. Providing stability for tenants seems a reasonable stance. At least would address the issue of those LL's that aren't really suited to running a business. In any other industry servicing customers is a prequisite to building a successful one. Taking a punt with something that is central to peoples lives is totally different.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards