We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What is P2P lending good for? (Zola, mostly)
Options
Comments
-
FatherAbraham wrote: »when one needs one's capital back for living expenses or an unexpected emergency.
If this is a potential scenario then P2P is definately not for you.0 -
I dipped my toe into Funding Circle a few years ago. It was surprising how many asset-backed guaranteed loans went bad, with assets turning out to be insufficient and guarantors going bankrupt.
Not really. When you lend money based principally on what the borrower can invent about their financial position, with no meaningful attempt to verify whether any of it is true, it is not surprising when many of those loans go bust with little or no recoveries. It may surprise but it is not surprising.0 -
I dipped my toe into Funding Circle a few years ago. It was surprising how many asset-backed guaranteed loans went bad, with assets turning out to be insufficient and guarantors going bankrupt.
If the collateral on offer was adequate. The borrower would have had no problem obtaining finance from a convetional source at a far cheaper overall cost. The value of "assets" is subjective. In a firesale full value is rarely if ever achieved.0 -
P2P, huh, yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Say it again, y'allRetired 1st July 2021.
This is not investment advice.
Your money may go "down and up and down and up and down and up and down ... down and up and down and up and down and up and down ... I got all tricked up and came up to this thing, lookin' so fire hot, a twenty out of ten..."0 -
Its good for me?0
-
If the collateral on offer was adequate. The borrower would have had no problem obtaining finance from a convetional source at a far cheaper overall cost.0
-
With Landbay by their figures being about 80% institutional money,The British Business Bank putting tax payers money through the likes of FC and BAE systems pension fund putting £200 million into P2P a couple of months back,maybe more people are in it then they realise0
-
As you've found, P2P is not suitable for money you might need within the next 5 years. It can be useful as a diversifier to other high risk investments, for up to 5-10% of your investments. Loans do need careful selection because there are a lot of rogue borrowers and worthless assets out there. If you weed those out through due diligence then what you are left with a worthwhile return after bad debt. It's a lot of work though and I have been gradually reducing my exposure because of this.
What's the diversification benefit considering P2P hasn't really been tested in an economic crash environment? If people are struggling to get their money back now in relatively mild conditions, it seems fairly safe to assume that there would be no negative correlation with other assets in a crash scenario.0 -
What's the diversification benefit considering P2P hasn't really been tested in an economic crash environment? If people are struggling to get their money back now in relatively mild conditions, it seems fairly safe to assume that there would be no negative correlation with other assets in a crash scenario.
You don't need negative correlation for there to be a diversification benefit, just low correlation. I also invest in private equity as a diversifier, as another example of an asset class that isn't negatively correlated, but has low correlation, with global listed equities.
Part of the reason people are struggling to get their money back is that P2P is less liquid than it is perceived. The other part is irresponsible lending on the part of P2P platforms. Platforms have little incentive to turn away business when it isn't their money at risk. This reduces the returns achievable during the good times. The loss potential during the bad times will depend on the specific loans in which you are invested and what the assets securing those loans (if any) are worth in a fire sale. So people will have vastly different outcomes depending on their specific investment decisions, and those letting the platforms decide for them might end up amongst the worst off.0 -
Albermarle wrote: »P2P comes in many guises and whilst the above statement is correct in many cases , it is a rather sweeping generalisation.
I was responding to the particular comment made. Investing in start-up's and companies in early stages of development is a high risk activity. The failure rate speaks for itself. The question for investors is whether the potential return is adequate. Benchmarking against other available rates of return is not a basis on which the judgement should be made.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards