We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

I paid for a mobile phone via bank transfer. Nothing delivered.

24

Comments

  • jonesMUFCforever
    jonesMUFCforever Posts: 28,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    tucrulodru wrote: »
    Well as someone who works in a Faster Payments fraud department I'm gonna have disagree with you there.

    To the OP. There is less than a 50% chance you will get your money back. The sooner you act the better. The other bank may have frozen the account for a number reasons. For example, another victim may have already reported the same thing as you. You want to act before the other bank releases the account back to the recipient.

    If the account had already been frozen would the bank transfer not have failed?
    It is also likely that somebody's account will have been used as a mule so the fraudster will get away with it and the poor sod who's account was credited will be closed with a probable CIFAS marker to boot.
  • Uxb1
    Uxb1 Posts: 732 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Apparently its all the rage for some foreign students when they leave the UK to "sell" their bank account to the fraudsters.
    They don't give a bleeding toss about the residents of the UK and they are not coming back here so could give even less about whether or not they get a fraud/CIFAS marker on the account: They are dckheads basically.
    Meanwhile the bank is almost certainly totally unaware that the account which was legitimately opened with all the right paperwork is now under the control of someone totally different........
    Welcome to the UK
    See
    https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/cyber-crime-overseas-students-selling-bank-accounts-fraudsters-finishing-studies-police/
  • 21amo
    21amo Posts: 7 Forumite
    tucrulodru wrote: »
    All of the advise above is wrong. Contact your banks fraud department. They can't refund but they indemnify the funds back. The money still needs to be in the recipient account for it to be successful. If your fraud department logs it as scam with the bank the money went to the account can be frozen asap.

    What bank are you with?

    I am with bank of scotland his account was hsbc
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    tucrulodru wrote: »
    All of the advise above is wrong. Contact your banks fraud department. They can't refund but they indemnify the funds back. The money still needs to be in the recipient account for it to be successful. If your fraud department logs it as scam with the bank the money went to the account can be frozen asap.

    What bank are you with?

    I find this very hard to beleive. That would mean the bank is getting involved in a dispute between two parties and acting as the arbiter of what happened.
    I don't doubt the OP at all but suppose OP did actually receive the phone but is fraudulently claiming they didn't? How is the bank meant to know which is correct?
  • Money_maker
    Money_maker Posts: 5,471 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The OP obviously made the transfer some time ago as there have been numerous attempts to contact the seller. Too much time has passed.
    Please do not quote spam as this enables it to 'live on' once the spam post is removed. ;)

    If you quote me, don't forget the capital 'M'

    Declutterers of the world - unite! :rotfl::rotfl:
  • If the account had already been frozen would the bank transfer not have failed?
    It is also likely that somebody's account will have been used as a mule so the fraudster will get away with it and the poor sod who's account was credited will be closed with a probable CIFAS marker to boot.

    Not normally. Frozen for payments out, not payments in.
  • AnotherJoe wrote: »
    I find this very hard to beleive. That would mean the bank is getting involved in a dispute between two parties and acting as the arbiter of what happened.
    I don't doubt the OP at all but suppose OP did actually receive the phone but is fraudulently claiming they didn't? How is the bank meant to know which is correct?

    Thats why I decided to contribute. There is a lot of misinformation around this. Without getting into specifics, we contact the other bank via a dedicated platform and advise them of our customers claim. They will immediately freeze the beneficiary account. For about 20 days they will investigate the receiving account. The benefit of doubt is with the victim not the beneficiary.
  • 21amo wrote: »
    I am with bank of scotland his account was hsbc

    So the best chance you have here is if HSBCs Safeguard has kicked in and slowed down the withdrawal limits on the fraudsters account. It happens quite often if the fraudster has set up a new HSBC account.

    Contact Bank of Scotlands fraud department for online and telephone banking. They will have a process to try and get the money back.
  • DCFC79
    DCFC79 Posts: 40,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Just dont buy a phone via Gumtree.


    Why did you choose Gumtree, was it cheaper than ebay ?
  • boo_star
    boo_star Posts: 3,202 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    tucrulodru wrote: »
    Thats why I decided to contribute. There is a lot of misinformation around this. Without getting into specifics, we contact the other bank via a dedicated platform and advise them of our customers claim. They will immediately freeze the beneficiary account. For about 20 days they will investigate the receiving account. The benefit of doubt is with the victim not the beneficiary.

    You're not really contributing at all, you're spreading misinformation.

    None of what you claim to be true is actually true.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.