Fine for entering wrong vehicle reg

familyguy321

This is the statement of account which I believe is similar to what others have received: https://imgur.com/ua1ZyVd

The £82 for 'Contractual and Administration Charges' in QDR's letters was £70 in previous letters from ZZPS.

beamerguy

familyguy321 wrote: »

This is the statement of account which I believe is similar to what others have received: https://imgur.com/ua1ZyVd

The £82 for 'Contractual and Administration Charges' in QDR's letters was £70 in previous letters from ZZPS.

QDR are scamming you with amounts not allowed

Amazing that their head honcho Wright Hassall solicitors have not learnt about scamming

Anyways, you have the perfect reference as QDR were spanked in court for ABUSE OF PROCESS
QDR (Part of Wright Hassall solicitors) spanked in Warwick court
for ABUSE OF PROCESS
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6029649/claim-form-but-not-the-driver&page=4

KeithP

familyguy321 wrote: »

Thank you to experienced members here who have helped me and others so far.

Ok, so I have read the guidance on post #2 of the Newbies thread following receipt of LoC from QDR and I have a few questions.

1) The guidance states to send a SAR to the PPC. This was already done in April which explicitly asked for a redacted copy of any records from the PDT machines. Their response was to show records only matching the exact VRN which of course would be blank. OPS did the same when responding to POPLA appeal. Will another SAR be worthwhile doing?

2) Are there any templates/example for the formal letter to send to QDR? Also, should this be done by email or post?

3) Is there any benefit of writing to MP at this point? Especially with this being in the news recently for small mistakes when entering registration: https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/huge-change-parking-rules-mean-3723512

Regards,
FG

1) No.

2) No. By email.

3) If you don't write to your MP I can assure you you will get no benefit.

familyguy321

beamerguy wrote: »

QDR are scamming you with amounts not allowed

Amazing that their head honcho Wright Hassall solicitors have not learnt about scamming

Anyways, you have the perfect reference as QDR were spanked in court for ABUSE OF PROCESS
QDR (Part of Wright Hassall solicitors) spanked in Warwick court
for ABUSE OF PROCESS
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6029649/claim-form-but-not-the-driver&page=4

Thank you beamerguy. Just read through the thread and will definitely be using AoP as a defence point if (or when) it gets to that.

familyguy321

KeithP wrote: »

1) No.

2) No. By email.

3) If you don't write to your MP I can assure you you will get no benefit.

Thanks KeithP, I'll start to draft a letter to MP.

With regards to (2), I will need some more guidance please. The newbie thread advises:

As well as the SAR to the parking firm's Data Protection Officer (DPO), also write a letter - by email to Gladstones or BW Legal or directly to whoever the PPC is, if they are not using a solicitor. Your letter can state that you have sent their client a SAR and so you require a restriction of data processing and the case should be put 'on hold'. Confirm your correct 'address for service' (especially if you've moved and they've traced you & might revert back to an old address).

If a SAR is not being sent and the address for service is already correct, what should the contents of the letter be?

Redx

to place it on hold due to seeking debt management advice (CPR principles)

as for the MP issue, if you dont complain to your MP the system wont change , we have already waited 10 months for the MHCLG to get it done , think BIGGER PICTURE

the AOP is not a defence point , its an objection in the defence and the later WS to the spurious added costs , it does nothing to address the main POC and nothing to address the issuing of a pcn , the core principle of the case


so it is not a defence to the invoice , just the additional costs

familyguy321

Thanks Redx, will draft a letter to QDR asking to place on hold.

One final question - is the letter to QDR in lieu of using their reply forms. This is an excerpt of the first page: https://imgur.com/Er7Z4R0

KeithP

familyguy321 wrote: »

One final question - is the letter to QDR in lieu of using their reply forms.

Yes. You will have read in the NEWBIES thread:

DO RESPOND - but DO NOT use the 'reply forms'. You do not have to declare your finances!

familyguy321

Yes, I did read that bit but just wanted to make sure that the letter is what is meant by 'do respond' instead of any other method. Thanks again

familyguy321

Is this fine to email QDR? I feel like it's too short but can't think of anything else to add.

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am in receipt of your Letter of Claim dated [date].

I would like to request that the case be put on hold whilst I seek debt advice.

Regards,
[Defendant]