We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Life insurance declined for recreational drugs

2»

Comments

  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 35,382 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Insurance is all about the risk based on statistical evidence.
  • Hasbeen
    Hasbeen Posts: 4,404 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Sorry, op? (I'm not english)

    Nobody's perfect:rotfl:

    OP Means Opening Poster that's you.
    The world is not ruined by the wickedness of the wicked, but by the weakness of the good. Napoleon
  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 6,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Carrot007 wrote: »
    Well you are not going to get one that covers the drugs, however it should not be to hard to get one that excludes them.
    That would be quite difficult given that life insurance doesn't normally come with exclusions. You can't generally pick and choose which causes of death you want it to cover, not least because most deaths have multiple.

    Plus the increased risk of insuring a drug user doesn't just come from the risk of a death directly caused by drugs, but because drug use is likely to be correlated with all sorts of other factors whicc increase the risk of early death, eg mental health issues, self-harm, lack of concern for one's health, generally reckless behaviour etc. So excluding death from a drug overdose would not make the user an attractive proposition for the insurer. Admittedly many of these issues are to be a bigger problem with a long term addict than someone who occasionally pops a pill at weekends.

    To the OP, assuming the drug use isn't recorded on your medical records (and your Facebook feed isn't full of stories about what you got up to last weekend), your best option might be to buy a time machine and answer "no". Unfortunately the first part of that is the tricky part...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 260K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.