We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Council Hell - Claim Advice

13

Comments

  • stragglebod
    stragglebod Posts: 1,324 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    What does the freeholder have to say about this?
  • agrinnall
    agrinnall Posts: 23,344 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    hayz347 wrote: »
    Does everyone really think its ok to have 1 bin collection since 14th December ??


    No, not at all. You mention involving councillors, what have they had to say about it? If it happened in my ward my councillor would be all over the Waste department until they came out to make the collection.
  • hollydays
    hollydays Posts: 19,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think this calls for going to a council meeting and pelting the councillors with rotten tomatoes..
  • NCC-1701
    NCC-1701 Posts: 530 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary
    Park somewhere else ASAP when you realised?
  • peter_the_piper
    peter_the_piper Posts: 30,269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Were there any other vehicles damaged by rats or was yours the only one? If more then a combined claim might have more weight.
    I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    https://www.lgo.org.uk/


    Im on the fence with this one. I don't think theres been enough one way or another to establish whether the council have been negligent or not. So I would suggest trying the lgo.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Are you sure that a claim under Section 45 is actually actionable and that damages are the correct resolution (rather than say Judicial Review etc)?

    Section 73 seems to suggest that civil liability (and damages) is restricted to breaches of Section 33 and 63.

    Also, you have freely stated that other people have been putting rubbish in your bins etc. Therefore it may also be possible that the Council could also state that it would not be reasonable for them to be liable for the actions of others if those actions exasperated the damage.
  • NeilCr
    NeilCr Posts: 4,430 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    https://www.lgo.org.uk/


    Im on the fence with this one. I don't think theres been enough one way or another to establish whether the council have been negligent or not. So I would suggest trying the lgo.
    '
    Yep.

    Although I am not entirely clear that the OP has been through the council's complaints process.

    I have to say we had a situation with waste not being collected (not BCC to be fair) and complaining "officially" rather than tweeting/ringing the helpline/contacting the Councillor worked like a dream. Plus the LGO likes you to have done that before going to them.

    "Hasn't checked the communal bins today mind you!"

    :eek::eek:
  • iammumtoone
    iammumtoone Posts: 6,377 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    edited 15 March 2019 at 8:00PM
    I think you need to make your letter clearer that is not your rubbish it is communal rubbish.

    When I first read it I was thinking no claim as you could/should have taken your rubbish to the tip yourself but when I read the comments from others I see this wasn't possible as you aren't just talking about your rubbish.

    I would take out the bit about being a business owner it is totally irrelevant.

    When I went back and looked at the photo, it doesn't help your defense as the car park looks empty so you could have parked further away from the rubbish. Do you have any others that show the only available parking spot was next to the rubbish?
  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    If you are determined to progress down this route then have a read of paragraph 6 of the general pre-croon protocol (https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct#6.1). The main take home is to be concise, factual, and to the point.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.