Albert street car park birmingham

U414830

Thanks Coupon—mad, that made me feel better as I was a little concerned I'd left out valid arguments. I will (with your help hopefully) put together a skeleton argument to include points missed.

U414830

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ohtspa7eqg5axxk/AAAp12GM9xZR9MqRf2ff1tkCa?dl=0

U414830

Coupon-mad, today I've received (please see link above) a supplementary witness statement from VCS. They are trying to counter some of the points I raised, the court date is very soon so I'd greatly appreciate some help if possible. I was going to draft together a skeleton argument or should I file it as supplementary ws? They have lied about our phone call and stated that they were willing to settle out of court, they have stated that it isn't unusual to have excel logo on the signage as they are lawful occupier even though alleged contract is with vcs.

KeithP

U414830 wrote: »

...they have stated that it isn't unusual to have excel logo on the signage as they are lawful occupier even though alleged contract is with vcs.

That is just ridiculous.

Any terms agreed by the driver at the time of parking would be those displayed on the signs.

If the sign is an Excel sign, then it is Excel who the driver allegedly agreed contract terms with.

VCS cannot subsequently decide to sue the motorist for a breach of contract with Excel.

VCS has absolutely nothing to do with the contract between Excel and the motorist.

U414830

My pay and display ticket is Excel so I paid Excel

U414830

I'm at the final stage now before hearing next week so all help would be appreciated

[Deleted User]

They don't have permission for a supplemental statement and, with respect, it's light on fact and heavy on legal argument.

I'd ask for it to be excluded as the points you raise are both simple and clearly set out in the defence.

U414830

Help required

U414830

Do I ask for it to be excluded during the hearing or should counter their points in a skeleton argument.?

Umkomaas

U414830 wrote: »

Help required

U414830 wrote: »

Do I ask for it to be excluded during the hearing or should counter their points in a skeleton argument.?

You've just received it from Johnersh. He's a qualified lawyer!