We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Problem lodgers!
Comments
-
Err...Just checking, what country are you in?Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi0
-
The term to use when confronted by the police is "Excluded Occupier" - This means they have very little protection from eviction unless their "licence to occupy" confers any contractual rights. Yje fact that there is no written agreement is to your advantage.
Do not refer to them as tenants or subtenants - They are lodgers, plain and simple.
If they do not pay rent, then they become "guests" of the unwanted type - Even easier to remove as they don't have permission to be in the property, so are trespassing.Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0 -
* the advice you have received above is correct- based on what you have told us
* they are lodgers, not tenants
* The Housing Act 1988 defines them as 'Excluded Occupiers', which means they are excluded from the protections that tenants get - you can quote this to the police.
* their eviction is a civil matter not a criminal matter - the police should not get involved
* having said that, for whatever reason, the police have got involved so cannot be ignored unless you want grief. Even if eventually all charges against you were dropped, arrest would be unpleasant!
* so visit your local police station and ask to see a senior officer. If necessary, register a complaint. Explain calmly the legal position as above
* repeat that you have given proper notice to your 'Excluded Occupiers' as defined by the Housing Act 1988
and that court procedures are not required. Your 'Excuded Occupiers' have a 'Licence to Occupy' which you can withdraw at any time, not a tenancy.
* if the police suggest that you are illegally sub-letting, this is a civil matter matter between you and your landlord, and not a criminal matter for the police.
*Make notes of what is said. Note the name, rank and number of the officer. But be polite!
* Then go back and change the locks and remove your lodgers0 -
I think subletting a COUNCIL house / flat is a criminal matter.
That may be what has caused the confusion.0 -
This may indeed be the cause of the police misunderstanding, but (from what's been said) the OP is not subletting.David_Evans wrote: »I think subletting a COUNCIL house / flat is a criminal matter.
That may be what has caused the confusion.
Hence the need to discuss and clarify with the police.0 -
Miss_Mary12 wrote: »Can their status change from lodgers to tenants because they have more than a year living at the address? And also will the fact that they receive mail at the adress changes anything..?
No, and no, in that order.0 -
This is nonsense and unless you were threatening the lodgers then police would not come out at all.
I think this maybe someone who has a bit too much time on their hands... Change the locks now, bag their stuff up and place outside and carry on with your day .
Get a locksmith out they can usually come out in an hour or so and change all locks and that's the end of it ,
Utter nonsense ..the whole post
Also how are you living in 4 bed social housing accommodation? , it seems extreme for two of you0 -
David_Evans wrote: »I think subletting a COUNCIL house / flat is a criminal matter.
That may be what has caused the confusion.
Taking in lodgers is actively encouraged by many councils as a way of providing more 'beds' and reducing the impact on occupants struggling with the 'bedroom tax. However, actually subletting (moving out and renting the property to someone else) a council property is a breach of tenancy.0 -
Thank you for all your advices! I will try and speak to a senior officer from the police and explain everything and just go from there.
I never said it was a social housing accomodation! It is a private letting!0 -
If you talk of subletting and of being a tenant landlord as you have done in this thread, you will confuse the issue with the police and your lodgers. They are simply lodgers and that's all.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



