PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that dates on the Forum are not currently showing correctly. Please bear with us while we get this fixed, and see Site feedback for updates.
Understanding Anti Money Laundering requirements of lenders and solicitors

Graham17
Posts: 2 Newbie
I’m selling a property following grant of probate. Should be a simple transaction. Buyer number one struggled to provide his solicitor or bank with adequate proof funds at the point of exchange. It was never clear which was not satisfied (suspect that having satisfied his solicitor’s requirements, he then failed to do the same for the lender and they pulled the mortgage offer). Some funds were being provided by a brother and were held in an Indian bank account, which clearly had a bearing.
Buyer number two is a very similar story. Willing buyer, willing seller but, again, at point of exchange, the solicitor has refused to continue with the transaction. The (Sharia) mortgage was approved and I’m assured that the deposit was from savings and readily evidenced. Tipping off rules prevent anyone telling me what the root cause of the deal collapsing is.
How do I avoid the same thing happening a third time and why did it get to the point of exchange before the AML requirements were being checked, whether by the lender or the solicitor?
All contributions welcomed.
Buyer number two is a very similar story. Willing buyer, willing seller but, again, at point of exchange, the solicitor has refused to continue with the transaction. The (Sharia) mortgage was approved and I’m assured that the deposit was from savings and readily evidenced. Tipping off rules prevent anyone telling me what the root cause of the deal collapsing is.
How do I avoid the same thing happening a third time and why did it get to the point of exchange before the AML requirements were being checked, whether by the lender or the solicitor?
All contributions welcomed.
0
Comments
-
Get your agent to do AML checks on the buyer at the point of offer/acceptance. (As they are required to do)0
-
Exactly what he was supposed to have done following the first deal falling apart but would that extend beyond the usual proof of ID and address? Would their checks extend to proof of funding? Are agents normally up to speed on AML and do I give him one last chance to redeem himself or do I start from scratch.....I know only I can answer last two questions.0
-
why did it get to the point of exchange before the AML requirements were being checked
For the estate agent checks, buyers might have shown a bank balance or a mortgage acceptance in principle just to progress matters, but either change their mind or have never intended to use those methods. And we've seen other threads here where purchasers have (for sometimes good reasons...) changed their plans during the course of a transaction.
And there are no standardised policies about AML checks, so the EA, lender, and solicitor may all take a different view about what's acceptable.
I'm not sure of the statistics but would have thought it's pretty rare for purchasers to pull out due to AML problems, so think you've just been very unlucky here.0 -
Get your agent to do AML checks on the buyer at the point of offer/acceptance. (As they are required to do)
Suggest you read some of the threads on this board posted by would-be buyers when EAs do that - it doesn't go down well, with the politest response being "speak to my solicitor", and the most common being an invitation to go forth and multiply.
Suspect the OP's just been unlucky, but maybe the demographic associated with overseas bank accounts and/or sharia mortgages will always make AML/KYC queries less straightforward...0 -
this anti money laundering thing is a joke. judging by the news it does not stop dirty money coming into the uk yet it puts innocent people through all sorts of issues when trying to transact like the op.
shouldn't law enforcement be able to weed out criminals rather than passing the book on solicitors?0 -
ReadingTim wrote: »Suggest you read some of the threads on this board posted by would-be buyers when EAs do that - it doesn't go down well, with the politest response being "speak to my solicitor", and the most common being an invitation to go forth and multiply.
I am aware that some take that view, however the government guidance is clear that the EA must carry out due diligence on both buyer and seller in the transaction...
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628696/Estate_Agency_Businesses_Guidance_.pdf
Para 4.70 -
I am aware that some take that view, however the government guidance is clear that the EA must carry out due diligence on both buyer and seller in the transaction...
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628696/Estate_Agency_Businesses_Guidance_.pdf
Para 4.7
I guess it's up to you as to whether the warm glow of complying with government guidance compensates for the buyers you alienate and transactions you prevent from taking place.0 -
ReadingTim wrote: »I guess it's up to you as to whether the warm glow of complying with government guidance compensates for the buyers you alienate and transactions you prevent from taking place.0
-
this anti money laundering thing is a joke. judging by the news it does not stop dirty money coming into the uk yet it puts innocent people through all sorts of issues when trying to transact like the op.
shouldn't law enforcement be able to weed out criminals rather than passing the book on solicitors?
Which criminals? You never broken he law?...0 -
ReadingTim wrote: »I guess it's up to you as to whether the warm glow of complying with government guidance compensates for the buyers you alienate and transactions you prevent from taking place.
Likewise it is up to buyers to decide if they are happy to miss out on a potential purchase just because they have a strop about AML checks.
I don’t expect EAs appreciate the bureaucracy any more than buyers do.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.7K Life & Family
- 254.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards