We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Channel 5: Britain's Parking Hell
Comments
-
Some of the comments about windscreens and tickets were bordering on Freeman on the Land stuff!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
BrownTrout wrote: »Another Tony Taylor Success here.
http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/yet-another-internet-expert-taken-to-task/
How childish by CPS :rotfl:
Fake news from a loser0 -
I didn't watch the programme, could do without the increase in blood pressure(!), but Radio 4 had a section on parking on the money programme a couple of weeks ago, which is available on podcast. It was quite nice listening to a PPC trade body rep being given some incoming by the other two guests :-)
A couple of interesting things on there, which I don't recall seeing on this forum, were that, in the opinion of one of the guests, PPC employees who place notices on vehicle windscreens, which have to be subsequently cleaned, could be considered to be causing criminal damage because they have no statutory power to do so, unlike local authority wardens who do. I suppose the guest bases this on the fact that criminal damage can be defined as altering the state of someone else's property and I'd be interested in your views.
The second point he raised was that, apparently, PCNs from PPCs that have words to the effect that the notice must not be removed by unauthorised persons are a breach of the codes of practice and therefore render the charge and issue of it invalid. Again, what are your views and experience relating to this?
The podcast is around 25 mins long and well worth a listen.
My bold- That complete and utter tosh, spouted by a person who is well known on this forum and in the industry. The company he runs made this comment to a customer:After escalating I received a sarcastic email in response which pointed out that there were legitimate reasons for ignoring me and criticism of that is a racially aggravated offence.
I will just leave the source of that quote below.
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/privateparkingappeals.co.uk0 -
Private parking is just a scam. Sick of it.0
-
I quite agree, landowners should all provide free parking for all, just like the bloke on the prog.0
-
BrownTrout wrote: »My bold- That complete and utter tosh, spouted by a person who is well known on this forum and in the industry. The company he runs made this comment to a customer:
I will just leave the source of that quote below.
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/privateparkingappeals.co.uk
Not that lot again, thought they went bust0 -
I'm surprised that Trustpilot have not sued him for calling them a Fake Review Company.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
-
OOhhhh. That turned into a lively thread!!
I did think that the criminal damage opinion was stretching the definition somewhat,I was interested in people's views nonetheless. I'd have thought that the BBC would be. bit more careful with their guests having seen the other thread, on the other hand.....0 -
OOhhhh. That turned into a lively thread!!
I did think that the criminal damage opinion was stretching the definition somewhat,I was interested in people's views nonetheless. I'd have thought that the BBC would be. bit more careful with their guests having seen the other thread, on the other hand.....
There are some very dodgy people around in the whole parking industry.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards