We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Stamp Duty Confusion

Stampduty
Posts: 10 Forumite
Just wondering if anyone can help.
I owned a home from 2007 - 2018 - now sold. The property was always solely in my name (bought before I met my husband).
We now are moving to a bigger house and wanted to do it in husbands name only (as he’s technically a first time buyer) and therefore pay £0 stamp duty (house under £300k).
We thought that this was perfectly fine but someone said it’s not allowed. Does anyone know if this is legal or not?
I owned a home from 2007 - 2018 - now sold. The property was always solely in my name (bought before I met my husband).
We now are moving to a bigger house and wanted to do it in husbands name only (as he’s technically a first time buyer) and therefore pay £0 stamp duty (house under £300k).
We thought that this was perfectly fine but someone said it’s not allowed. Does anyone know if this is legal or not?
0
Comments
-
See here for rates "if you've bought a property before":
https://www.gov.uk/stamp-duty-land-tax/residential-property-rates
As a married couple you are consdered to be a single unit. You have bought before, so....
See calculator here:
https://www.gov.uk/stamp-duty-land-tax/residential-property-rates0 -
So we’re at a disadvantage because we’re married? That doesn’t seem fair!0
-
a) who said life was fair?
b) why is it not fair - you have committed to life together so you are treated for some purposes by the authorities and/or certain corporations as a married couple0 -
There are all sorts of SDLT complications around a married couple where one only buys a property! Although as a shorthand, it is sometimes said that a married couple are treated as a unit, this is not how the rules work.
One rule, for the higher rates of SDLT, is that if a person is living with a spouse and buys a property alone, then the purchase has to be judged as if the spouse is buying as well. If the spouse buying the new property would be liable to the higher rates, then the higher rates apply to the purchase.
Here, if your spouse alone buys, the higher rates would not be due on account of your circumstances (you have already sold).
The first time buyers' relief rules are different. If he alone buys then, so long as the higher rates are not due, your circumstances do not count.
This assumes that you are not a "purchaser". It is not enough for to escape being a purchaser that the new place is bought in your spouse's name. It is also important that you have no underlying share in the new property. That might not fit your circumstances where it sounds as if it is OP with some cash from the sale. Is the spouse able to afford to buy alone?0 -
Because if we were unmarried but in a long term committed relationship we could save £4000+ - the guidance regarding being treated as one is under the higher rates of TAX rules (where presumably you wouldn’t be living in both properties as your main residencies) - think I’ll seek further legal advice on this and let you know the outcome. Thanks for your input.0
-
We are using a guarantor mortgage - the bank have not raised any concerns with this - it was just a friend who suggested it mightn’t be allowed! I don’t want to do anything which is illegal.0
-
There is a detailed write up on the first time buyer rules available on the pdf linked from here: https://www.blakemorgan.co.uk/news-events/blog/sdlt-first-time-buyers-relief/ You should look at section 6.1 and get to know Soul and Nesa!! That covers a similar situation to yours.0
-
We are using a guarantor mortgage - the bank have not raised any concerns with this - it was just a friend who suggested it mightn’t be allowed! I don’t want to do anything which is illegal.
What matters most for SDLT is who has the underlying ownership of the property. If you are both putting money in, then you would normally both have shares in the property, even if it is registered in the name of one of you alone.0 -
As usual, much more detailed answer from SDLT Geek than mine.
:T0 -
Thanks, both of you, for your help ��0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards