We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Claim Form received from BW Legal (Britannia)

1234568

Comments

  • s7huj
    s7huj Posts: 37 Forumite
    edited 22 July 2019 at 4:11PM
    Did you also serve the bundle on the claimant, as required?

    The court wont tell you they have recieved it...

    Yep did that and kept evidence of the recepit.

    ANYWAY

    So hearing was today ...

    We ran up to the hour alotted and a lot of time was spent analysing POFA 2012 and the fact that I claimed it hadn't been properly followed by the claimant. The solictor representing the claimant was unable to demonstrate that POFA 2012 had been followed, in particular the period in which an NTK must be issued and that it must mention that the creditor will pursue the keeper after 28 days.

    The judge was unhappy that I was unwilling to provide the name of the driver and has adjourned the hearing to allow the claimant to provide evidence that POFA 2012 was followed (despite me providing very clear evidence it wasn't!). He said it could have all been resolved today had I provided the name of the driver and that I was acting unreasonably.

    Bit of an odd experience, it's like the judge hadn't reviewed anything we had submitted and was complately unaware of POFA 2012.
  • s7huj
    s7huj Posts: 37 Forumite
    Judge adjourned for soonest date after 35 days.
  • He said it could have all been resolved today had I provided the name of the driver and that I was acting unreasonably.
    True - but only because the PPC then wouldn't have to rely on PoFA. The correct answer is that it is up to the claimant to prove who is driving - and most template defences put them to proof on exactly that point (and PoFA).
  • mixMZ
    mixMZ Posts: 54 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Can you tell us the name of the Judge?

    I understand it was Southampton Court?
    Got very similar case next week...
  • s7huj
    s7huj Posts: 37 Forumite
    Judge Sparrow.

    Claimant has now submitted Notice of Discontinuance ...
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    well done


    ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST !
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    s7huj wrote: »
    Judge Sparrow.

    Claimant has now submitted Notice of Discontinuance ...

    Really ?

    Proving that they do not want to defend ABUSE OF PROCESS
  • s7huj
    s7huj Posts: 37 Forumite
    Unfortunately (not knowing exactly how the hearing process works / and no disrespect to Judge Sparrow), the Judge really didn't seem to understand ANYTHING about private parking and charge notices. He was unfamilair with POFA too.

    Anyway, yes, another one bits the dust! - largely thanks to the kind and helpful community on this forum. So thankyou again.

    I did submit a cost schedule, what happens with this? Whilst I'm not desperate to pursue it, it does seem nuts how much time I wasted on this :(
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    s7huj wrote: »
    Unfortunately (not knowing exactly how the hearing process works / and no disrespect to Judge Sparrow), the Judge really didn't seem to understand ANYTHING about private parking and charge notices. He was unfamilair with POFA too.

    Anyway, yes, another one bits the dust! - largely thanks to the kind and helpful community on this forum. So thankyou again.

    I did submit a cost schedule, what happens with this? Whilst I'm not desperate to pursue it, it does seem nuts how much time I wasted on this :(

    It does not follow that the judge did not understand, some of them are very smart and he maybe wanted to see how BWLegal handled this. In the end BWL understood they would get a whooping, hence they bowed out
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You should've raised the issue of your costs with the Judge after the Judgment had been made - whilst still in the court.

    I fear you may be too late to claim costs now.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.