FU = First Utility

societys_child

Its referred to as handshakes, but who knows what happens at lodges . . wives not all allowed

martinthebandit

Ah, so he's not a seaker of truth and light eh?*



*I'm quite impressed with how many levels that works on**


** and again!

Rainbowgirl84

I'm guessing they meant 'moronic' perhaps?

MothballsWallet

societys_child wrote: »

Something to do with triangles and symbols, apparently.

Not realised FU was actually a bunch of Freemasons . .

And being a Company of Secrets

KateBob

societys_child wrote: »

Its referred to as handshakes, but who knows what happens at lodges . . wives not all allowed

Don't knock it,I get rid of his nibs at least 2 nights a month and I get to take the mickey out of him about it to boot!

Although it does mean I get invited to ladies nights at the lodge and the other wives try to arrange get togethers 😱

Tetra

pollypenny wrote: »

I'm intrigued. What is 'Masonic language'?

As easy example is Yours Sincerely
rather than Yours sincerely

Not the biggest of deals, but one might wonder why someone who's job includes typing a valediction gets it wrong repeatedly.

See also (above),

MothballsWallet wrote: »

And being a Company of Secrets

Pollycat

Tetra wrote: »

As easy example is Yours Sincerely
rather than Yours sincerely

Not the biggest of deals, but one might wonder why someone who's job includes typing a valediction gets it wrong repeatedly.

See also (above),

Wow!
I'm not sure I'd even have noticed that.

Is using a capital 'S' instead of a lower one really an indication of Masonic language?

DoaM

No, it's just an indication of someone Who's Instinct Is To Capitalise Every Word.


And that then becomes the default valediction in a letter template.

Aquamania

Pollycat wrote: »

The OP was having trouble with FU a while ago:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5891142/first-utility-nasty

So are we to now assume that even Resolver failed to resolve the OP's complaint to the OP's satisfaction too?

Pollycat

Aquamania wrote: »

So are we to now assume that even Resolver failed to resolve the OP's complaint to the OP's satisfaction too?

Well, yes.
But according to the OP:

Tetra wrote: »

At every stage, via Resolver, the response was the same and from the same named person. At the end First Utility sent me a Masonic unsigned letter, from apparently the same named person.

Never used Resolver so no idea if this is normal.