We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Car Insurance cheaper without first name Mohammed

Options
2»

Comments

  • Aretnap
    Aretnap Posts: 5,737 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Quite simply, Yes.
    Genuine question: is it?


    I know that a lot of factors that insurers rate on (eg postcode, occupation) are to a large extent markers for social class. So I can believe hat there might be a difference in claim rates between people called Wayne and Kevin, and people called Tarquin. (Apologies to any Waynes, Kevins or Tarquins reading) And as there'e no rule against discriminating on the grounds of class that would be legally unproblematic.


    But it IS illegal to discriminate on the grounds of race, religion or sex, even if there's a good actuarial reason for it... so charging John more than Mary, or Mohammed more than Harry runs dangerously close to being direct discrimination doesn't it?


    I know that you can rate on things which are indirectly related to race or sex, so it's fine to charge bricklayers more than nurses (say) - but name seems a lot more direct than that, and if it were legal it would give insurers an easy way of getting round the law on sex discrimination with nearly 100% effectiveness (the odd Sam and Chris excepted).
  • stator
    stator Posts: 7,441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The answer is that it's not specifically illegal to charge different prices to people with different names, but it would almost certainly be found to be secondary discrimination by a court of law and therefore illegal.
    Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.
  • Aretnap wrote: »
    I know that you can rate on things which are indirectly related to race or sex, so it's fine to charge bricklayers more than nurses (say)

    This is different, its a risk assessment based on policies that include commuting as well as social use, there is statistically more chance of being involved in an accident commuting to and from building sites.

    An individual builder with no accidents and non-commuting isn't penalised by your statement above. Just like a commuting nurse with accidents inst favoured.

    Men do still pay more on average, even since the gender directive became law, but that's not due to discrimination , its simply because on average, men have more accidents, which is because on average, men include commuting in policies more than women, and therefore do more miles in riskier situations.
    The greatest prediction of your future is your daily actions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.