Letter Before Claim - Gladstone solicitors - after 16 months

Redx

if any of these people harassing you have failed the PaP or any laws etc then tell it to the judge when the time comes, but in the meantime get the SAR and LBC rebuttal done and sent asap

not that this will stop the court claim, that will arrive quite soon anyway, but you need to be seen to be replying, with proof of engaging with them and proof of demanding evidence and proof of you complying even if they dont comply


its a paper excercise

ajent_a

Redx wrote: »

if any of these people harassing you have failed the PaP or any laws etc then tell it to the judge when the time comes, but in the meantime get the SAR and LBC rebuttal done and sent asap

not that this will stop the court claim, that will arrive quite soon anyway, but you need to be seen to be replying, with proof of engaging with them and proof of demanding evidence and proof of you complying even if they dont comply


its a paper excercise

Thanks for the advice. Started on the letters already. Please explain what you mean by PaP? I couldn't find it on the acronym list on the Newbie sticky post,

KeithP

PaP = Pre-action Protocol.

As mentioned in LETTER1 in your opening post:

...the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims under the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 ('the PAP').

nosferatu1001

OP - what were telling you is theat

THEY CLAIM they sent the original LETTER1 40 or so days ago
You cannot prove they did not send it
You canhowever state it was not RECEIVED.

They have merely included a copy of the letter they supposedly sent all that time ago.