Letter Before Claim - Gladstone solicitors - after 16 months

ajent_a

KeithP wrote: »

I get the impression from the letters in your opening post that LETTER1 is allegedly a copy of a letter sent earlier.

LETTER2 is recent and saying that as you haven't replied to LETTER1 they'll give you another 14 days to respond.

Not sure why you have since posted lots of other stuff.
Is this the equivalent of tossing the file across the table and saying "you sort it out"?

Sorry but I'm new to these things, I thought it would be helpful.

ajent_a

KeithP wrote: »

I get the impression from the letters in your opening post that LETTER1 is allegedly a copy of a letter sent earlier.

LETTER2 is recent and saying that as you haven't replied to LETTER1 they'll give you another 14 days to respond.

Not sure why you have since posted lots of other stuff.
Is this the equivalent of tossing the file across the table and saying "you sort it out"?

Letters 1 and 2 were received today in the same envelope. Apologies if all this looks incoherent.

Redx

if they gave you 30 days to respond and included financial forms or a link to forms, then reply with a rebuttal to their LBC


and if you have not done so, send the PPC a SAR to their DPO with 30 days notice, getting all they have on you

Pirate_Parker

Well, now you know if it gets that far it's £19 per hour.

The first thing I want to draw your attention to is this;

Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Paragraph 4(5) The maximum sum which may be recovered from the keeper by virtue of the right conferred by this paragraph is the amount specified in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(c) or (d) or, as the case may be, 9(2)(d) (less any payments towards the unpaid parking charges which are received after the time so specified).

The amount has been artificially increased and would be an abuse of process if they filed a claim at the court asking for this.

This increase in the original "charge" is a direct contravention of POFA 2012.

You need to read POFA 2012 and tear their Notice to Keeper apart looking for as many reasons for no keeper liability as possible - then if they take you to court you'll be able to prove abuse of process due to the artificially increased figure and prove it's a vexatious claim.

KeithP

ajent_a wrote: »

Letters 1 and 2 were received today in the same envelope. Apologies if all this looks incoherent.

Yes you told us that.

Letter2 is the letter you received today.

Enclosed with that is a copy of a letter sent you some time ago Letter1.

ajent_a

Redx wrote: »

if they gave you 30 days to respond and included financial forms or a link to forms, then reply with a rebuttal to their LBC


and if you have not done so, send the PPC a SAR to their DPO with 30 days notice, getting all they have on you

Hi Redx
Letter 1 that supposedly gives me 30 days to respond was says it was printed 40 days ago. Both letters were received today.

So for the SAR I should follow the template from legalbeagals website?

Redx

if you like, but this is close to a court claim so better get things moving asap

ajent_a

KeithP wrote: »

Yes you told us that.

Letter2 is the letter you received today.

Enclosed with that is a copy of a letter sent you some time ago Letter1.

Yes, only they didn't send it (letter 1) some time ago, this is the first time I received this.

Redx

frankly, I dont care, you have been told what to do and time is of the essence

ajent_a

Redx wrote: »

frankly, I dont care, you have been told what to do and time is of the essence

Thanks for the advice.