We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Council Tax on empty property

24567

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Agrinnall, so just because they want to discourage people and increase revenue makes it okay? Does that mean you don't take issue with any local or country wide policy?
    Agrinnall was explaining to you the reasons behind the policy, which I thought was your question? Not whether we all agree with the policy.
  • boo_star
    boo_star Posts: 3,202 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 3 December 2018 at 10:49PM
    Agrinnall, so just because they want to discourage people and increase revenue makes it okay? Does that mean you don't take issue with any local or country wide policy?

    Sometimes you would hope that in a society, people can look beyond a balance sheet and use common sense.

    They is no discouragement taking place since i am relocating and trying to sell. Trust me, i wish i could ever afford the luxury of just having a place lie empty.

    I'm not saying it should be nil as i still own the place and there are still road services, emergency services etc...

    It's easy to be indifferent when it doesn't affect you i guess ;)


    No, it just makes sense.

    Lack of housing is a problem in the UK right now and anything that can be done to make owning an empty property less desirable is a good thing. Perhaps not to you, but it certainly is to the millions of people that are struggling to buy right now.

    Besides, you may still need the police/fire service to attend so paying nothing isn't going to happen.
  • Thanks for the replies.
    I can see the other side of the argument but i guess to me a blanket policy just isn't an equitable approach. Sure it takes more to administer each case leading to more spending if dealt with individually but sometimes it just feels like you are being kicked while you are down.

    I don't see that i should have to feel pressured to lower my house price just because of the pressure of a council tax charge and be okay with that as I'm not trying to swindle anyone.

    Moving isn't so much through choice but a need for family reasons for me. Life doesn't always go as planned as we had intended to stay where we were long term originally and money is tight as it is.

    I don't own a BTL and have never missed payments, claimed benefits and am law abiding and will of course pay council tax where i am soon to be living.

    Davidmcn.. it was more Agrinall saying i should be thankful I'm not paying more which was why i responded. Personally i don't think i need to be thankful that someone hasn't tightened the already cosy shackles ;)

    On the citizens advice website it does say that different councils can determine policy so it's definitely varied across the board.

    AdrianC, touche ;) i guess you can get blinded when you are in it.

    Some economic policy baffles me when it can affect those who just make ends meet in order to try to change the behaviour of the people who do take advantage
  • We could all say that - and I know I'm baffled by economic policy that charges single people so much more on bills than someone who is living together/married. I'm baffled by childless people having more money taken off them in tax for those that have children.....etc etc.

    I expect the only people happy with economic policy are those who have a good income, are married/coupled-up, have children.
  • True. I agree. It's a much broader issue.
    Obviously i will have to get on and just accept it regardless - I'm sure in 10 years time i will barely remember it!

    Personally right now i believe that economic policy should be heavily focused on persuading people to make greener choices and forcing companies to do the same (e.g. reduced corporation tax for companies that eliminate one use plastics where applicable and other green initiatives such as renewables and home based working where possible) but that in itself would cause some to be disadvantaged so I'm sure so it's not easy.

    I get that we all need to make money but to me, not at the expense of losing our compassion or humanity for others
  • OP, do the maths and don't fall for the 'sell it cheap and quick' argument. If you hold out for a fair offer on your old home you will make enough to cover the comparatively small amount of CT.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ...but i guess to me a blanket policy just isn't an equitable approach.
    It isn't a blanket policy.
    Each local authority decides their own policy, according to local conditions.

    I don't see that i should have to feel pressured to lower my house price just because of the pressure of a council tax charge
    You don't HAVE to lower it. A year's council tax will cost, what, a grand and a bit? How much would you lower it for a quick sale?


    But it DOES give you an incentive to decide to sell more quickly, rather than take your time.
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    but that in itself would cause some to be disadvantaged so I'm sure so it's not easy.
    your choice of example policy you regard as "worthy" leaves me beyond cold since I sit in the cold unable to afford heating due to the levies applied to the energy prices I pay to support the greens

    further to that my taxes are then used to also subsidise that agenda. Compared to that your whining over having to pay a bit of council tax on an empty property is so much hot air I wished was in my house
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Agrinnall, so just because they want to discourage people and increase revenue makes it okay? Does that mean you don't take issue with any local or country wide policy?

    Sometimes you would hope that in a society, people can look beyond a balance sheet and use common sense.

    They is no discouragement taking place since i am relocating and trying to sell. Trust me, i wish i could ever afford the luxury of just having a place lie empty.

    I'm not saying it should be nil as i still own the place and there are still road services, emergency services etc...

    It's easy to be indifferent when it doesn't affect you i guess ;)


    I'm in the same position, it affects me, I'm dropping the price, i think its a reasonable position for the council to take, we need houses more than we need people hanging on to get a few more £ for them
  • Murphybear
    Murphybear Posts: 8,236 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    My house has a one bed annexe that is rated separately for council tax and so I pay two lots at my address. Only the main property is discounted for single occupancy, even though the annexe is also in my name and vacant, they wouldn't apply two single occupancy discounts.


    In the end I ripped out the kitchen and bathroom and they delisted it. But then they moved my main house up a band as it now included the annexe for ratable value and charged me extra for that!

    Whatever you do, you can't win :(
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.