We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Planning Condition to stop up a highway. How?
Options
Comments
-
This sounds an unreasonable condition and probably wouldn't meet the six tests. You cannot force people into a process over which they cannot control i.e a stopping up because the process is completely separate.
I would be interested in seeing the wording of the condition and also whether the lay-by was contained within the original planning application's red line or blue line or if it was neither.0 -
This sounds an unreasonable condition and probably wouldn't meet the six tests. You cannot force people into a process over which they cannot control i.e a stopping up because the process is completely separate.
For example, a developer being expected to fund the cost of parking restrictions which have to be implemented before construction starts.
I'd say the only one of the six tests where there is even a doubt would be whether the condition is reasonable. The need to provide parking in association with residential development is an established requirement (except in exceptional circumstances). The developer has the option of providing the parking within the development boundary, but presumably this would limit the development potential of the site. Meeting the parking requirement by placing the bay on the public highway is an alternative approach, provided that the bay is available for use when needed by the occupier of the developed property.
If the space is to be reserved for the use of the occupier, then it is reasonable for the highway authority to expect them either to pay for the exclusive right (legally dubious) or to remove the land from the public highway since the rights of the public would no longer apply if an ajoining owner had exclusive use of that space.
The only question is whether the Highway Authority can justify the removal of the public right to use the space, which is why they need to follow the stopping up process.
If the public object, then the developer needs to rethink the development so the parking provision is met in some other way."In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
In planning terms you can, and it is common practice.
For example, a developer being expected to fund the cost of parking restrictions which have to be implemented before construction starts.
I'd say the only one of the six tests where there is even a doubt would be whether the condition is reasonable. The need to provide parking in association with residential development is an established requirement (except in exceptional circumstances). The developer has the option of providing the parking within the development boundary, but presumably this would limit the development potential of the site. Meeting the parking requirement by placing the bay on the public highway is an alternative approach, provided that the bay is available for use when needed by the occupier of the developed property.
If the space is to be reserved for the use of the occupier, then t is reasonable for the highway authority to expect them either to pay for the exclusive right (legally dubious) or to remove the land from the public highway since the rights of the public would no longer apply if an ajoining owner had exclusive use of that space.
The only question is whether the Highway Authority can justify the removal of the public right to use the space, which is why they need to follow the stopping up process.
If the public object, then the developer needs to rethink the development so the parking provision is met in some other way.0 -
Town & Country Planning Act 1990 s247 provides for stopping up highways to enable a planning permission to be implemented. See https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/8/section/247
If the Land Registry doesn't show the area of the road to be de-highwayed as registered then it is highly likely that the general presumption would apply that without evidence to the contrary the land to the middle of the road belongs to the person owning the land on that side. So get the road closed and then apply to the Land Registry to add the area to the title.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards