Non molestation order

Comms69 · 20 November 2018 at 8:50AM

Jennyedwards wrote: »

Explain what further that he is also try to take 20k that was not his 18month ago.
This does not give him the rite to threaten stalk verbally and physically assault som1. Or does it. All recorednon cctv and with police

You must remember that these (whilst I have no doubt are true) are allegations at this point.

A non-molestation order should always be contested; the law behind it is bad. This means that the respondent can be arrested basically on your say so.

Any criminal offences will be investigated, and if there is enough evidence, will be prosecuted.

A non-molestation order, when served ex-parte, is basically granted purely on your say so. There is no check done.

I would expect this order to be discharged, maybe replaced with undertakings (or joint undertakings)

elsien · 20 November 2018 at 8:56AM

I also think that while you consider that he may owe you the money, that in itself is nothing to do with harassment and non-molestation orders. It's a different issue to his behaviour and shouldn't be conflated.

agrinnall · 20 November 2018 at 9:52AM

Jennyedwards wrote: »

Agrinnal
Why do you think they would not grant one if use worked together.
If you have been harassing someone and threading and stalking a person.
Just because you work together does not mean that it is ok.
It could be your neighbour or anyone.

I note that you didn't answer the question, so I'll ask it again: did you tell the court that you work together?

I'm not saying that they wouldn't have granted an order, just that it wouldn't have been this one, because the 100m part of it is pretty well impossible to conform to in a work setting.

As things stand, one answer would be for you to leave and get a job somewhere else.