Any success with CM services ltd £100 notice

Umkomaas

Rudess wrote: »

I recently received a NTK from the above company, it says £60 if paid within 14 days, but you have 21 days to appeal. In the newbie thread it says to appeal in 3 weeks for this IPC company, so if I only appeal after 3 weeks, the fine will be more than £60 by the time of the appeal? or is it ok to appeal also before the 14 days passed?

It sounds like you are wanting to pay them?

The reason for delaying the appeal is to deflect them from accessing your data from the DVLA, without which they cannot hold the RK liable (Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4).

You'll have to probably convince a Judge much later in the process because initial appeals don't return cancellations from the PPC (whether IPC or BPA operator) and with IPC operators, the second stage appeal to the IAS doesn't work either.

If you're wanting to pay nothing you take your chance by digging in for the long run (up 6 years - there are thousands doing so, don't be intimidated by that timescale).

But for further advice you need to start your own thread.

Coupon-mad

Rudess wrote: »

Why is it pointless, and why it won't work? will I need to pay this PCN or what?

You need to read any other IPC thread, we can't answer that basic question from scratch. The NEWBIES thread tells you it doesn't *work* and not to try IAS.

Please read the sticky thread to understand the IPC game.

NO IDIOTS PAY THEM.

SUCCESS COMES IF THEY TRY A SMALL CLAIM (NO BIG DEAL, NO RISK, NO CCJ).

Rudess

Coupon-mad wrote: »

You need to read any other IPC thread, we can't answer that basic question from scratch. The NEWBIES thread tells you it doesn't *work* and not to try IAS.

Please read the sticky thread to understand the IPC game.

NO IDIOTS PAY THEM.

SUCCESS COMES IF THEY TRY A SMALL CLAIM (NO BIG DEAL, NO RISK, NO CCJ).

Thank you, appreciate it.

Rudess

Coupon-mad wrote: »

You need to read any other IPC thread, we can't answer that basic question from scratch. The NEWBIES thread tells you it doesn't *work* and not to try IAS.

Please read the sticky thread to understand the IPC game.

NO IDIOTS PAY THEM.

SUCCESS COMES IF THEY TRY A SMALL CLAIM (NO BIG DEAL, NO RISK, NO CCJ).

I hope you don't mind me posting here instead of opening a new thread.



I have just noticed that the NTK was issued 1 day after the alleged contravention occoured, and that's in addition to the parking ticket served on windscreen.



Am I right to assume that it invalidates the PCN as:
'(Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver'

Umkomaas

Rudess wrote: »

I hope you don't mind me posting here instead of opening a new thread.

Sorry, but you have been asked politely to start a new thread. This is how the forum operates - one case, one thread, otherwise advice can get confusing and the confusion can be potentially costly.

Ultimately it's your choice where you actually post, but don't be too surprised if no one responds.

Rudess

Hi There


I have received an NTK from CM Services LTD that was issued 1 day after the alleged contravention occoured, and that's in addition to the parking ticket served on windscreen.

Am I right to assume that it invalidates the PCN as schedule 4 of paragraph 9 of POFA requires the NTK to be issued:
'(Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver'



If I'm right, should I use this in the appeal?

Umkomaas

Umkomaas wrote: »

Sorry, but you have been asked politely to start a new thread. This is how the forum operates - one case, one thread, otherwise advice can get confusing and the confusion can be potentially costly.

Ultimately it's your choice where you actually post, but don't be too surprised if no one responds.

Rudess wrote: »

Hi There


I have received an NTK from CM Services LTD that was issued 1 day after the alleged contravention occoured, and that's in addition to the parking ticket served on windscreen.

Am I right to assume that it invalidates the PCN as schedule 4 of paragraph 9 of POFA requires the NTK to be issued:
'(Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver'



If I'm right, should I use this in the appeal?

Speechless! :cool:

Rudess

Umkomaas wrote: »

Speechless! :cool:

I have published new thread, not sure who decided to merge it

Le_Kirk

Rudess wrote: »

I have published new thread, not sure who decided to merge it

Just send a PM to one of the board guides, Crabman, Savvy or Soolin and ask one of them to move the bits off this thread and merge them with the one you correctly started.