We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Claims company or go solo?

2»

Comments

  • @taff - I'm pretty sure it will have been online with a phone call to confirm.

    @Moneyineptitude - I think the ground you're providing has already been covered. If my initial reason for disputing the PPI isn't good enough, help me find one that is.

    Thanks
    DG
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,585 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Usual rules of misselling don't apply when applying online, because unless the tickbox was automatically selected, which they will check for if you complain, then the end result is you missbought, rather than were missold.
    If you agreed to the PPI over the phone, again, there'll be a record of it from the phone call, if you are rejected with your complaint, Egg will have to provide a copy of their phone spiel to the FOS.
    You could go for single premium as a reason, but again, because you bought it online, you have slim hope with this.


    Make your complaint, expect nothing and you won't be disppointed.
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    BadBadger wrote: »
    If my initial reason for disputing the PPI isn't good enough, help me find one that is.
    The main MSE site has an advice article detailing how you may (or may not) have been mis-sold PPI;
    https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/ppi-loan-insurance/#checklist

    Unfortunately, applying online means that no one actually sold the insurance to you so you are going to struggle with any complaint you might make unless the box selecting PPI was pre-populated and you had to actively deselect it.

    If the loan was still being paid off in 2008 or later, you may obtain a Plevin refund of undisclosed commission.

    Just don't complain that the PPI was added without your knowledge and permission.:)
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,379 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    BadBadger wrote: »
    Hi, @Nearlyold

    I appreciate that might be the case but some of the responses went beyond 'that's not a great reason' to 'you agreed to it and forgot because you're an idiot'. I'm looking for advice and reassurance, not accusations.

    In terms of other reasons why PPI wasn't suitable - I have no idea, I guess that's what I was asking in my second question. Are there a list of common reasons that PPI is mis-sold that I could compare to my own circumstances for example?

    Thanks
    Dave


    No-one is calling you an idiot, simply pointing out that 15 years after the event it's unlikely you remember exactly the wording of the form and what you did. As an example, you said you always tick to say "I don't want PPI", what if you misread and the box was to take out PPI and you ticked it by mistake (the bank don't know this, only that you ticked the box)?


    There are plenty of reasons PPI was miss-sold but they may not apply to you and you would be expected to provide evidence of these, hence why no-one on here will tell you what to write to try and "game" the system. E.g. NHS workers with 6 months full pay, 6 months half pay if they were sick/unable to work with effectively guaranteed redundancy packages (as opposed to a private firm which could go under and leave you with the bare minimum) are good reasons why credit card PPI was not needed, however, if you didn't work for the NHS, claiming you had these excellent benefits will harm your case when they ask you to prove it.


    As I said above, submit the complaint and see what they come back with, they may identify another failing you didn't know about, they may see the sum is low and just auto-pay, they may reject, you won't know unless you submit.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.