We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Asbestos found in soil around new extension

Paradon_of_Apathy
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hello,
I am trying to sell my house, and the property is under offer. Rather frustratingly the buyers have done a survey of the garden and land around an extension that was built approx 6 years ago.
The survey has turned up asbestos in the aggregate that was used as infil around the foundations for the extension.
I am aware that asbestos has been illegal for use in the building trade for a number of years now - the question is, is using contaminated aggregate a common practice or do I have a claim against the company who built the extension for the costs of removing the contaminated soil etc. If so - what is the best way to go about it..?
Many Thanks in advance for any helpful replies! :j
I am trying to sell my house, and the property is under offer. Rather frustratingly the buyers have done a survey of the garden and land around an extension that was built approx 6 years ago.
The survey has turned up asbestos in the aggregate that was used as infil around the foundations for the extension.
I am aware that asbestos has been illegal for use in the building trade for a number of years now - the question is, is using contaminated aggregate a common practice or do I have a claim against the company who built the extension for the costs of removing the contaminated soil etc. If so - what is the best way to go about it..?
Many Thanks in advance for any helpful replies! :j
0
Comments
-
Of course it's not common practice.
Where's the asbestos from?
When you dig foundations, you pull out the earth, you backfill woth concrete and you'll use a small amount of the earth to level off, but there will be plenty of soil left over. There's no need to use anything other than what comes out.
So either the asbestos was in the earth that they dug out, or they added it in on purpose to hide it - but you wouldn't usually have much of a depth to fill in.
It's intriguing that they surveyed the land. That's unusual. They must have spotted?Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
I knew a builder a few years ago who told me recently that if he found asbestos on a site would "lose" it in a convenient slab he was pouring. I'm surprised that the buyers had a specific survey, is there history in the area of asbestos? Are you even sure that the testing is independent? it would be a strange way to try an negotiate down.0
-
The survey of the land was due to the house being on a hill and the buyers were concerned that the extension would be prone to subsidence so they did a geotechnical survey of the land around the extension.
Cant really comment on the "independence" of the survey, but the lab reports state that the asbestos found is the blue type and as such is the worst possible outcome and I doubt a lecensed and registered laboratory would run the risk to fabricate such a result.
I am keen to know if this (ie the cost of removal or the loss of value on the house) is something I can throw back at the builders who did the extension!0 -
Paradon_of_Apathy wrote: »I am keen to know if this (ie the cost of removal or the loss of value on the house) is something I can throw back at the builders who did the extension!
That proof would probably require extensive sampling of the infill 'aggregate' almost on a forensic basis.
You really need more information from the geotech survey - are they talking about fragments of material - crushed asbestos cement board say, or is it loose fibre?
The cause could be something as simple as the builder incautiously removing asbestos soffits on your house, and dust from these contaminating a pile of aggregate stockpiled for the backfill operation.
Ultimately it could become an HSE issue if the builder has purchased a contaminated batch of recycled aggregate... the HSE might want to explore the source and establish whether there is a widespread problem.
Unfortunately the survey has created a lot more questions than it has answered.
On a tangential point, this highlights the importance of using competent contractors when disposing of asbestos. One scenario is that the source could be an outbuilding (e.g. a shed or garage) on your property which was demolished by sledgehammer (perhaps long before you moved in). Since asbestos doesn't rot, someone else's decision not to get the job done properly might now end up costing you dearly."In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
maisie_cat wrote: »I knew a builder a few years ago who told me recently that if he found asbestos on a site would "lose" it in a convenient slab he was pouring.
It happens, but is morally indefensible."In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
Unfortunately many builders don't take asbestos seriously enough. Because the majority(myself included) have worked with asbestos in the past, there is the attitude that the risks are over exaggerated and companies are cashing in on the removal.
Probably due to the fact that it can take many years to have any effect.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards