Britannia Parking POPLA appeal

Le_Kirk

martindias wrote: »

i'm trying to - i wish it was more obvious

On the first page of this forum is a large blue button marked NEW THREAD, click on it. If you are on a mobile you might not be able to access all the facilities of the forum.

KeithP

martindias wrote: »

i'm trying to - i wish it was more obvious

What? You're having trouble starting a new thread?

In your MSE lifetime you have started eight threads - two within the last three months.

The process is the same on all boards.

martindias

Yep and each time i have to relearn - however I'll take that up in a general Forum topic.

Not easy for computer iliterates like me - but thanks for your guidance

crazydoglady91

Ah yes I see that, I’ll get that done! I was a bit unsure whether to put the landowner authority bit in there. They did send me a (heavily redacted) copy of the landowner contract. You can’t even tell who the landowner is though, so I guess I could say something about that.

Le_Kirk

crazydoglady91 wrote: »

Ah yes I see that, I’ll get that done! I was a bit unsure whether to put the landowner authority bit in there. They did send me a (heavily redacted) copy of the landowner contract. You can’t even tell who the landowner is though, so I guess I could say something about that.

You don't need to know who the landowner is, it is for the claimant to prove their case, so all you do is "put them to strict proof."

crazydoglady91

Hi all,

I’ve been reading all the developments on the BW Legal hearings regarding Abuse of Process with great interest. I must have missed all this when putting my defence in, but I’ll add it for my WS.

My WS is due to be filed by 4pm on 28th Nov. I’m in the process of complaining to the SRA right now. While I’m collating evidence and putting my statement together, I wondered whether it might be worth contacting BW Legal about this? I would have hoped (naively, perhaps) that given the very recent rulings against them in this area that they might reconsider pursuing the claim. Would it be worth writing to them to point out that they’ve already been told that they’re undermining previous rulings, the POFA, and CRA? I suppose appealing to logic only works if you’re talking to logical people though :rotfl:

1505grandad

A poster - RonnieHML - started a new thread today because BWL are appealing against the OP's case being thrown out for AoP, so I don't think they will take any notice if you write to them.

beamerguy

crazydoglady91 wrote: »

Hi all,

I’ve been reading all the developments on the BW Legal hearings regarding Abuse of Process with great interest. I must have missed all this when putting my defence in, but I’ll add it for my WS.

My WS is due to be filed by 4pm on 28th Nov. I’m in the process of complaining to the SRA right now. While I’m collating evidence and putting my statement together, I wondered whether it might be worth contacting BW Legal about this? I would have hoped (naively, perhaps) that given the very recent rulings against them in this area that they might reconsider pursuing the claim. Would it be worth writing to them to point out that they’ve already been told that they’re undermining previous rulings, the POFA, and CRA? I suppose appealing to logic only works if you’re talking to logical people though :rotfl:

As 1505grandad says,there is simply no point in contacting BWLegal now. They are one of those firms who think they are above the law and the courts are stamping on their toes right now,

The penny has not yet dropped with BWLegal, doubt it ever will but in the meantime we assume they get off being spanked

Coupon-mad

1505grandad wrote: »

A poster - RonnieHML - started a new thread today because BWL are appealing against the OP's case being thrown out for AoP, so I don't think they will take any notice if you write to them.

I think it is worth it. Wind them up like this (adapt it to make sense):

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76513231#Comment_76513231

And here is one drafted by a person who is at LBC stage:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76517845#Comment_76517845

I suspect BW Legal will have put the application in for RonnieHML's case before the hearing took place on 11th November, and maybe there are others...perhaps they put several in, over the Summer.

They all need crushing; Courts can't hear the same things twice - that in itself appears to be an abuse of process because if BW Legal want this matter reviewed, picking new victims is not the way to go about it.

If they want it reviewed they should be putting in an appeal to 'Hizzoner' Iain Hughes QC, for permission to appeal the one involving CEC16.

crazydoglady91

Thanks everyone, I suppose it can’t hurt to send something off. If I point out that I’m well aware of recent events and will be producing evidence and court reports, they might decide not to bother I suppose. Worth a shot!