We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Company refusing to escalate complaint

Options
2

Comments

  • So if not the trading standard or the Ombudsman who do you go to?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Loubell123 wrote: »
    So if not the trading standard or the Ombudsman who do you go to?
    Your only option is a legal professional.

    I doubt you'd win in court, however.
  • Carrot007
    Carrot007 Posts: 4,534 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Loubell123 wrote: »
    So if not the trading standard or the Ombudsman who do you go to?


    Your only option is small claims.
  • well in order to put this right, it is going to cost me around £800, so is it worth it?
  • bigisi
    bigisi Posts: 925 Forumite
    Loubell123 wrote: »
    well in order to put this right, it is going to cost me around £800, so is it worth it?

    How do we know?
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,972 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Loubell123 wrote: »
    So if not the trading standard or the Ombudsman who do you go to?

    Briefly...

    You would make a claim in the small claims court for 'breach of contract' - because the paint is 'not fit for purpose'.

    You can include 'consequential losses' in your claim - i.e. the cost of redecoration.

    (The Consumer Rights Act adds an implied term to a contract that any goods must be 'fit for purpose'.)
  • DCFC79
    DCFC79 Posts: 40,641 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Loubell123 wrote: »
    well in order to put this right, it is going to cost me around £800, so is it worth it?


    That is for you to decide.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    eddddy wrote: »
    The Consumer Rights Act adds an implied term to a contract that any goods must be 'fit for purpose'.
    Valspar will doubtless argue that previous odour issues have been eradicated in 2018 and that their offer was goodwill rather than an admission of liability.

    Personally, I'd accept the goodwill refund.
  • verityboo
    verityboo Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    eddddy wrote: »
    Briefly...

    You would make a claim in the small claims court for 'breach of contract' - because the paint is 'not fit for purpose'.

    You can include 'consequential losses' in your claim - i.e. the cost of redecoration.

    (The Consumer Rights Act adds an implied term to a contract that any goods must be 'fit for purpose'.)

    And the contract is with who you bought the paint from so B&Q?
  • This is the other side of it, B&Q state that they will always pass on the complaint to Valspar, even though I have told them the contract is with them. So it all just goes round in circles.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.