We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Worst average return on 60% equity portfolio over the next 20 years?

1235

Comments

  • System
    System Posts: 178,433 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Audaxer wrote: »
    That definitely seems like a worst case scenario if it only covered inflation averaging say 2.5% total return a year. If that was the case for most medium risk 60/40 equity bond portfolios, that surely would be a big problem for a lot of retirees hoping a drawdown of 3.5% would be a safe withdrawal rate?

    Not really unless they wanted to leave all of their principle fund for heirs to inherit. If it increased 2.5% a year and you drew down 3.5% or even 4% a year you'll be dead long before the money runs out.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • MK62
    MK62 Posts: 1,855 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Tarambor wrote: »
    Not really unless they wanted to leave all of their principle fund for heirs to inherit. If it increased 2.5% a year and you drew down 3.5% or even 4% a year you'll be dead long before the money runs out.


    If the fund increased by the rate of inflation each year, currently 2.5%, and your initial withdrawal rate was 4% (and you increase this withdrawal in line with inflation each year), you would run out of money after 25 years......you might not be dead by then...:wink:
  • coastline
    coastline Posts: 1,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If most investors are in 60/40 or 50/50 due to attitude to risk then safe withdrawals could well be limited who knows ? Trouble is nobody knows what their attitude to risk is until it really happens.
    Lets say there's a major downturn and your 60/40 fund has fallen 20-30% but the 100% equity fund has fallen 50%. This has created an opportunity for a switch into 100% equity. Why would you do that ? Well that downturn or crash has happened and its unlikely to happen again soon going off past events.
    Using the FTSE dating back to 1984 its base was 1000 and the yield was just under 4%. Today its at 7300 and still yields a similar figure.
    What about inflation ? £1000 yielding £40 in 1984 is around £128 today and the FTSE at 7300 is yielding a good £280.

    https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator

    https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1633409/Historic-inflation-calculator-value-money-changed-1900.html


    Thing is a downturn would probably give an investor a 6% yield on the FTSE which gives ample room for a dividend cut back to 4%.
    Now we have a safe withdrawal rate if you are really that concerned about it.? To be honest its something that never bothered me as I just cleared off from work with my pile of cash and investments and never looked back.

    A few links below..this ones updated

    https://www.youinvest.co.uk/our-services/free-dividend-dashboard

    https://www.youinvest.co.uk/articles/investmentarticles/51254/how-need-income-could-underpin-uk-stocks

    https://www.ukvalueinvestor.com/2015/05/the-ftse-100-at-5000-or-10000.html/
  • Audaxer
    Audaxer Posts: 3,552 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Alexland wrote: »
    Yes but 20% cash seems a bit high and if you held that over the long term it would act as a noticeable drag on returns.
    It might but are bonds not currently as big a drag on returns as cash?
  • Audaxer
    Audaxer Posts: 3,552 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MK62 wrote: »
    If the fund increased by the rate of inflation each year, currently 2.5%, and your initial withdrawal rate was 4% (and you increase this withdrawal in line with inflation each year), you would run out of money after 25 years......you might not be dead by then...:wink:
    Even if you only withdrew 3.5% a year increasing in line with inflation the £100k would only last 28 years. As the example is an average growth rate of 2.5%, it might not even last as long as that if there is a poor sequence of returns at the start.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,561 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Audaxer wrote: »
    It might but are bonds not currently as big a drag on returns as cash?

    They certainly don't look attractive in the short term but who knows what happens next? At least with bonds you stand a chance of upside when equities go down. Although we have had a few too many days with nowhere to hide recently for my liking.

    Alex
  • A_T
    A_T Posts: 975 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Vanguard Investor have a fun tool for this sort of thing:

    https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/investing-explained/tools/asset-mixer
  • rathernot
    rathernot Posts: 339 Forumite
    A_T wrote: »
    Vanguard Investor have a fun tool for this sort of thing:

    https://www.vanguardinvestor.co.uk/investing-explained/tools/asset-mixer

    How accurate is that?

    Asking as the average return doesn't seem to vary that much over the last 30 years even if you dial it down to 20% equities.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Alexland wrote: »
    At least with bonds you stand a chance of upside when equities go down.

    Correlation has all but disappeared. What do you regard as bonds? The original scenarios were based on US Treasuries. Yields on Gilts are currently extremely low. Blue chip corporate bonds only offer 2.5% to 3%. Little different to the rate of inflation. Investors have little choice but to go for equities. Therein lies the conundrum. Portfolios are exposed to a high degree of risk. At a time in life when this may not be the option desired.
  • rathernot
    rathernot Posts: 339 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Correlation has all but disappeared. What do you regard as bonds? The original scenarios were based on US Treasuries. Yields on Gilts are currently extremely low. Blue chip corporate bonds only offer 2.5% to 3%. Little different to the rate of inflation. Investors have little choice but to go for equities. Therein lies the conundrum. Portfolios are exposed to a high degree of risk. At a time in life when this may not be the option desired.

    This is what I'm trying to work out - is there actually any safe haven other than cash if there's a downturn?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.