Planning Permission (with apologies to thesaint)

bgwuser

If Generali HAS been arrested I just want you all to know it was NOTHING to do with me!!! (but I feel guilty so will he accept some Ky jelly as compensation?)

Thanks for making me laugh.

nelly_2

Generali wrote: »

It was meant to be reminiscent of the post you(?) did in response to the person that was getting upset that someone had left some junk behind where you posted as if you were the other party.

So its not your house?

anyway retro PP like normal PP is'nt set in stone I know cos Im in the trade and me dad was an architect for like 50 million years and it apears they decide on a whim rather than useing a fixed set of criterior

My dad has had plans knocked back, that have later, been acepted with no changes what so ever

cryterior

critirior

cry tear rear

whatever

Melissa177

Don't panic everyone, I had a call from Generali, his hedge fund is bailing him out of jail

Doozergirl

Melissa177 wrote: »

Don't panic everyone, I had a call from Generali, his hedge fund is bailing him out of jail

I thought we were going to need a whip round!

krishna

nelly wrote: »

apears they decide on a whim rather than useing a fixed set of criterior

My dad has had plans knocked back, that have later, been acepted with no changes what so ever

cryterior

critirior

cry tear rear

whatever

criteria. Oh, and it's also
appears
using
accepted

Sorry, couldn't resist

SquatNow

Is it me or did the OPs failed buyer post their side of the story as a question a couple of days ago?

Generali

SquatNow wrote: »

Is it me or did the OPs failed buyer post their side of the story as a question a couple of days ago?

It's you....

Jonbvn

Assuming this thread may actually be serious (I am doubtful), I would guess that the orginal buyers are peeved at missing out on your property.

Since the original buyers did not actually buy anything from you, fraud cannot have occurred since nobody lost any money.

If you made some claim about your house which you knew to be false, you could be sued for misrepresentation under common law (not criminal law - therefore KY not required). However, issues such as retrospective PP are generally grey areas, and it is unlikely any judge would find in their favour.

Tell them to go forth & procreate......

Generali

Just to make it perfectly clear to those that missed the point, this post was aimed as a bit of gentle ribbing to bgwuser who seems to have taken it in the spirit it was intended.

I was trying to show how the poster's actions could be construed from the other side and perhaps entertain at the same time.

My use of KY Jelly or any other lubricating products is between me, Mrs Generali and Big Dave.

thesaint

Generali wrote: »

Just to make it perfectly clear to those that missed the point, this post was aimed as a bit of gentle ribbing to bgwuser who seems to have taken it in the spirit it was intended.

I was trying to show how the poster's actions could be construed from the other side and perhaps entertain at the same time.

My use of KY Jelly or any other lubricating products is between me, Mrs Generali and Big Dave.

Oh! I haven't seen the other thread.

You had me for a moment,

When I read the thread, my 1st thought was "Generali, Mrs Generali and the Generalissimo's(sp) live in rented accomodation".

I thought that since my self-imposed exile from the board you'd seen the light and bought a house. :rolleyes:

I see why the apology is included in the title, next time PM me to save me from looking a fool, I do that enough without your help.

I'm off to do a 'search' for bgwuser.




p.s 'Big Dave' aint that big, an oxymoron if ever there was one.