Indigo Penalty - Railway carpark

Fruitcake

Troubled42 wrote: »

We've had one subject access request returned. (came through today actually - money suckers working overtime at the weekend to extort the public?)
Still refusing to erase data under the basis we provide documentation that we are no longer liable for the original payment.

On that basis - what would be the statement of complaint provided to the ICO?

No debt has ever been proved. This is a byelaws case and therefore only a magistrate's court can decide that a debt exists as a result of a penalty conviction (or whatever the correct terminology is).
The claim is now statute barred by the Magistrate's Act and therefore there can be no conviction and therefore no debt can be proven, or now occur. Therefore is no reason for the scammers to hold your data.

waamo

Troubled42 wrote: »

We've had one subject access request returned. (came through today actually - money suckers working overtime at the weekend to extort the public?)
Still refusing to erase data under the basis we provide documentation that we are no longer liable for the original payment.

On that basis - what would be the statement of complaint provided to the ICO?

The basis of complaint is they no longer have need to process your data. The law is clear this times out after 6 months. You shouldn't have to prove anything.

Snakes_Belly

I recently picked up your message. I have only just accessed the new forum. If the incident that you mention in your message relates to the railway car park at Burton on Trent my parking ticket was not in relation to this car park but the Excel Derby Street Car park. Myself and other posters have defended claims with regard to parking tickets from the Derby Street Car Park. The Indigo Car park and the Derby Street Car park do overlap and it can be confusing.