Is this a hazard?

George_Michael

Deastons wrote: »

Isn't the car parked on a pavement?

Well, it's been photoshopped onto a pavement.
This is the OP's car!
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b1cb6059f87708a8b58a1b2/t/5b4d8ca070a6adb7c48ab253/1531812769505/exotics.jpg?format=1500w
and I think this is the hazard:
https://vinnybyrne-jlcl7yt4p8acxzg.netdna-ssl.com/media/wysiwyg/button/automotive.jpg

neilmcl

George_Michael wrote: »

Well, it's been photoshopped onto a pavement.
This is the OP's car!
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b1cb6059f87708a8b58a1b2/t/5b4d8ca070a6adb7c48ab253/1531812769505/exotics.jpg?format=1500w
and I think this is the hazard:
https://vinnybyrne-jlcl7yt4p8acxzg.netdna-ssl.com/media/wysiwyg/button/automotive.jpg

Well spotted that man :T

societys_child

it's been photoshopped

Glad you found that, it puzzled me why the two cars stood out so much.


Just enlarged the pic in Paintshop Pro and you can see the join!

WaywardDriver

societys_child wrote: »

Glad you found that, it puzzled me why the two cars stood out so much. Just enlarged the pic in Paintshop Pro and you can see the join!

You didn't seriously think they were the actual cars!

societys_child

Obviously not. The photoshopping was amateur and obvious.


What I really don't get, is why . . .

Mercdriver

I noticed at a quick glance - the lighting on the cars is very different to the dull day light around them.

I also don't get the point why to go to all that trouble...

Deastons

George_Michael wrote: »

Well, it's been photoshopped onto a pavement.
This is the OP's car!
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b1cb605
and I think this is the hazard:
https://vinnybyrne-jlcl7yt4p8acxzg.net.jpg

Well clearly the image is doctored. Perhaps I should've posed my question more clearly to avoid confusion:

Isn't the image of the car that has been superimposed onto the photograph in such a position that the car it is representing would be parked on a pavement?

Deastons

societys_child wrote: »

Obviously not. The photoshopping was amateur and obvious.

Yet you still had to enlarge it in Paintshop Pro to confirm it to yourself...

James2k

Deastons wrote: »

Well clearly the image is doctored. Perhaps I should've posed my question more clearly to avoid confusion:

Isn't the image of the car that has been superimposed onto the photograph in such a position that the car it is representing would be parked on a pavement?

This better?

societys_child

Deastons wrote: »

Yet you still had to enlarge it in Paintshop Pro to confirm it to yourself...

I didn't have to do anything. Just curious.