We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

72 hours to notify shop of problem with kitchen

Hi, we are buying some kitchen units from Wren. I have just noticed that their delivery policy states that you have 72 hours from delivery to notify them if the items are missing or damaged. Is this even legal? Surely if they send you a faulty cupboard and you don’t unpack it for a few days for logistical reasons this doesn’t mean they are no longer bound by the usual legal requirements?

Comments

  • jk0
    jk0 Posts: 3,479 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I wonder if that condition is set by the carrier, rather than the supplier?


    I'd give the boxes a good check over IIWY, and tick off every item. It should be obvious from the box if it has been damaged.
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    j_yorks wrote: »
    Hi, we are buying some kitchen units from Wren. I have just noticed that their delivery policy states that you have 72 hours from delivery to notify them if the items are missing or damaged. Is this even legal? Surely if they send you a faulty cupboard and you don’t unpack it for a few days for logistical reasons this doesn’t mean they are no longer bound by the usual legal requirements?

    Unfair contract term guidance may provide some useful reading (particularly 5.4.1 onwards to about 5.7.8/pages 70-78)

    Under the consumer rights act, any lack of conformity in the first 6 months is assumed to be inherent so it is particularly misleading for a retailer to try and disclaim liability within that period. Although it can still be misleading to use disclaimers after this period as the retailer will remain liable if the goods subsequently prove to inherently fail to conform.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • I got caught on this. Some hinges missing, but didnt notice for a few weeks as wasnt fitting it till then. Wren were useless, wouldnt budge, in the end bought a pair form screwfix for £8, wanst worth the hassle.
    I just tell people to avoid Wren, they are a shower of s..t., customer service is the worst I have ever encountered. manned by vile people. On the plus side I have told people who were going to buy a kitchen about how poor Wren are and they've gone elsewhere, so Wren have lost out on a few grand of orders, and although its a drop in the ocean it makes me feel better :)

    Consumer rights probably cover it, but be prepared to fight, or better still dont buy a kitchen from Wren, google Wren, plenty of bad experiences
    One man's folly is another man's wife. Helen Roland (1876 - 1950)
  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    I run a property maintenance company and we fit around 20 kitchens a year. Three years ago, against my better judgement, we fitted a Wren Kitchen. The customer still hasn't received all of the kitchen and has now sourced alternative parts elsewhere. Most terrible company that has ever existed. Now I refuse to fit them.
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,601 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I would perhaps avoid Wren altogether...

    It would realistically be an unfair term but given Wren's reputation, be prepared for a battle if you do find anything wrong.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • lewisa
    lewisa Posts: 301 Forumite
    j_yorks wrote: »
    Hi, we are buying some kitchen units from Wren. I have just noticed that their delivery policy states that you have 72 hours from delivery to notify them if the items are missing or damaged. Is this even legal? Surely if they send you a faulty cupboard and you don’t unpack it for a few days for logistical reasons this doesn’t mean they are no longer bound by the usual legal requirements?


    To me this sounds more like a term related to the delivery process. For example, if you take delivery of 12 boxes but the delivery note says 15 boxes, you have 72 hrs to inform them there were 3 boxes missing.


    Beyond that if you're fitting the stuff 2 months later and find a number 7 widget missing or side panel 6 cracked, i'd expect them to be reasonable, and if they choose to be unreasonable one option would be to ask the price of the spares, buy the spares, then credit card chargeback the value of the spares from the original purchase.
  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,093 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    lewisa wrote: »
    To me this sounds more like a term related to the delivery process. For example, if you take delivery of 12 boxes but the delivery note says 15 boxes, you have 72 hrs to inform them there were 3 boxes missing.


    Beyond that if you're fitting the stuff 2 months later and find a number 7 widget missing or side panel 6 cracked, i'd expect them to be reasonable, and if they choose to be unreasonable one option would be to ask the price of the spares, buy the spares, then credit card chargeback the value of the spares from the original purchase.

    No. You are very wrong. Wrens terms and conditions state that the whole kitchen must be checked within 72 hours and reported to them. After that they will not honour ant missing items or defects.


    They are a scandalous company.
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
  • It does state that but I’m not sure they’ve got a leg to stand on legally speaking.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.